| Literature DB >> 29780773 |
Hye-Joo Lee1, Wonkyo Shin1, Yun Jeong Jang2, Chel Hun Choi1, Jeong-Won Lee1, Duk-Soo Bae1, Byoung-Gie Kim1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) is the rarest form of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) and the optimum management is still controversial. In this study, we analyzed the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of 6 consecutive patients with PSTT treated in our institution.Entities:
Keywords: Gestational trophoblastic disease; Placental site trophoblastic tumor; Prognosis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29780773 PMCID: PMC5956114 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.3.319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obstet Gynecol Sci ISSN: 2287-8572
Clinical features, treatment, outcome in 6 patients with placental site trophoblastic tumor
| Characteristic | Patient number | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| Age (yr) | 29 | 32 | 32 | 29 | 31 | 33 |
| AP | N/A | Term | Term | Term | Term | Term |
| Interval from AP (mon) | N/A | 6 | N/A | 3 | 10 | 12 |
| Presenting features | IVB | IVB | IVB | IVB | IVB | Amenorrhea |
| β-hCG at diagnosis (mIU/mL) | 171.0 | 32.0 | 0.4 | 35.9 | 2.6 | 903.5 |
| FIGO stage | I | I | I | I | I | I |
| Mets (No./site) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Myometrial invasion | Superficial | Deep | Superficial | Superficial | N/A | Deep |
| Mitotic index, (mitoses/0 HPF) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8 | N/A | 4 |
| IHC | N/A | N/A | Ki-67 (5–10%), CK 8 & 18, CD 10 | Ki-67 (>10%) | Ki-67 (>10%), hCG | Ki-67 (20%), hPL, hCG, CK 7 |
| Dx procedure | D/E | D/C/B | D/C/B | D/C/B | D/C/B | Image |
| Surgery | TAH | TAH, RSO, LS, PLND | SPA-H, BS | TAH, ROC | LAVH | TAH, BS |
| Chemotherapy | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Outcome | NED | NED | NED | NED | NED | NED |
| Follow-up (mon) | 2 | 84 | 46 | 73 | 48 | 1 |
AP, antecedent pregnancy; IVB, irregular vaginal bleeding; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; β-hCG, beta human chorionic gonadotropin; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Mets, metastasis; HPF, high-power field; IHC, immunohistochemistry; CK, cytokeratin; hPL, human placental lactogen; Dx, diagnostic; D/E, dilatation and evacuation; D/C/B, dilatation and curettage and biopsy; TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy; RSO, right salpingo-oophorectomy; LS, left salpingectomy; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection; SPA-H, single port assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy; BS, bilateral salpingectomy; ROC, right ovarian cystectomy; LAVH, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy; NED, no evidence of disease; N/A, not available in reported pathologic data.
Fig. 1Image findings of case 6. (A) Transvaginal ultrasonography showed a multicystic mass measuring 7.8×5.1 cm in the posterior uterine wall with abundant blood flow, suspected gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). (B) Abdomen-pelvis computed tomography. (C) Pelvis magnetic resonance imaging showed about 7.2 cm sized mass with internal vascular structure in uterus. (D) Positron emission tomography-computed tomography.
Fig. 2(A) Macroscopic features of placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT): about 6.5×4.2 cm sized irregular mass with infiltration of full depth of myometrium. (B) The PSTT had monomorphic intermediate trophoblastic cells extensively infiltrating the myometrium. (C) The tumor cells are large, mononucleate placental site intermediate trophoblast with scattered multinucleated cells. The cells have abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and marked nuclear pleomorphism with large convoluted nuclei (hematoxylin and eosin staining, original magnification ×50, ×50).
Fig. 3Immunohistochemical findings of case 6. (A) Tumor cells were positive for human placental lactogen (hPL). (B) Tumor cells were focally positive for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). (C) About 20% of the tumor cells were positive for Ki-67. (D) Tumor cells were strongly positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK 7).
Summary of reports of placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) in literature
| Author | No. of cases | Age (mean, yr) | AP | Interval to AP (median, mon) | β-hCG (median, IU/L) | Prognostic risk factors | Treatment (percent of patients) | Outcome (survival or NEDa)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chang et al. [ | 88 | 30.0 | Term/preterm (59%) | 12.00 | 467.3 | FIGO stage | Hysterectomy (84%) | OS |
| Abortion (26%) | Adjuvant CTx (25%) | - Stage I/II: 93.5% | ||||||
| H-mole (13%) | Primary CTx (34%) | - Stage III/IV: 33.3% | ||||||
| Choriocarcinoma (2%) | ||||||||
| Unknown (13%) | ||||||||
| Feltmate et al. [ | 13 | 31.2 | Term (54%) | 16.50 | 257.0 | Interval from AP (>24 mon) | Hysterectomy (92%) | Not reported |
| Abortion (38%) | Mitotic index | Adjuvant CTx (55%) | ||||||
| H-mole (8%) | Metastatic disease | Primary CTx (44%) | ||||||
| - Immediate CTx (≤1 wk from surgery) in high risk | ||||||||
| - EMA-EP for adjuvant CTx | ||||||||
| Hassadia et al. [ | 17 | 36.1 | Term (59%) | 18.00 | 13,923 | FIGO stage (IV) | Hysterectomy (65%) | NED |
| Abortion (12%) | Interval from AP (>48 mon) | Adjuvant CTx (29%) | - Stage I: 47% | |||||
| Unknown (29%) | β-hCG (>10,000) | Primary CTx (35%) | - Stage III: 29% | |||||
| Age (>40 yr) | ||||||||
| Baergen et al. [ | 55 | 32.0 | Term (57%) | 18.00 | 691.0 | FIGO stage (III/IV) | Hysterectomy (89%) | OS: 80–86% |
| Abortion (17%) | Interval from AP (>24 mon) | Adjuvant CTx (35%) | - Stage I: 91–92% | |||||
| H-mole (26%) | β-hCG | - Stage III/IV: 41% | ||||||
| Deep invasion | ||||||||
| Mitotic index | ||||||||
| Clear cytoplasm | ||||||||
| Tumor necrosis | ||||||||
| Age (>35 yr) | ||||||||
| Schmid et al. [ | 62 | 34.6 | Term (60%) | 18.00 | <1,000.0 | FIGO stage | Hysterectomy (85%) | OS: 70% |
| Stillbirth (16%) | Interval from AP (>48 mon) | Adjuvant CTx (13%) | - Stage I: 93% | |||||
| Abortion (10%) | Prognostic score | Primary CTx (32%) | - Stage II: 52% | |||||
| H-mole (15%) | Mitotic index | - Stage III/IV: 49% | ||||||
| β-hCG | ||||||||
| Age | ||||||||
| No. of metastasis | ||||||||
| Lan et al. [ | 5 | 36.4 | Term (60%) | 7.00 | 50.0 | LN metastasis | Hysterectomy (100%) | NED |
| Stillbirth (20%) | Adjuvant CTx (60%) | - Stage I: 40% | ||||||
| Abortion (20%) | - Stage II: 20% | |||||||
| Chen et al. [ | 17 | 31.7 | Term (88.2%) | 14.20 | 556.7 | Not reported | Hysterectomy (100%) | NED |
| Abortion (12.8%) | Adjuvant CTx (47%) | - Stage I: 82.3% | ||||||
| - EMA-CO for adjuvant CTx | - Stage III:12.8% | |||||||
| Hyman et al. [ | 17 | 34.1 | Term (53%) | 9.00 | 132.0 | FIGO stage | Hysterectomy (94.1%) | NED |
| Abortion (35%) | Interval from AP (>12 mon) | Adjuvant CTx (100%) | - Stage I: 85.7% | |||||
| H-mole (12%) | Term AP | - Beneficial Tx for Stage I: hysterectomy only | - Stage III/IV: 33% | |||||
| β-hCG | ||||||||
| Age (>40 yr) | ||||||||
| Zhao et al. [ | 108 | 31.8 | Term/preterm (62%) | 25.13 | 154.3 | FIGO stage | Hysterectomy (78.7%) | OS: 93.5% |
| Abortion (28.7%) | Interval from AP (>36 mon) | Preserve fertility Txb) (21.3%) | - Stage I: 100% | |||||
| H-mole (7.4%) | Prognostic score | - No significant difference in stage I PSTT | - Stage III/IV: 87.9% | |||||
| Unknown (1.9%) | Tumor necrosis | Adjuvant CTx (79.6%) | ||||||
| Deep invasion (>50%) | ||||||||
| Our study | 6 | 31.0 | Term (83.3%) | 8.00 | 34.0 | Not determined | Hysterectomy (100%) | NED |
| Unknown (16.7%) | - Stage I: 100% |
AP, antecedent pregnancy; β-hCG, beta human chorionic gonadotropin; NED, no evidence of disease; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; CTx, chemotherapy; OS, overall survival; EMA-EP, etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D/etoposide, cisplatin; LN, lymph node; EMA-CO, etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D/cyclophosphamide, vincristine; Tx, treatment.
a)Until last follow-up; b)Curettage (10.2%), excision of uterine lesion (9.3%), pulmonary lobectomy (1.8%).