Literature DB >> 29780429

Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in U.S. environmental law.

Robin Kundis Craig1,2, Ahjond S Garmestani3, Craig R Allen4,5,6, Craig Anthony Tony Arnold7,8, Hannah Birgé6, Daniel A DeCaro9, Alexander K Fremier10, Hannah Gosnell11, Edella Schlager12.   

Abstract

Adaptive governance must work "on the ground," that is, it must operate through structures and procedures that the people it governs perceive to be legitimate and fair, as well as incorporating processes and substantive goals that are effective in allowing social-ecological systems (SESs) to adapt to climate change and other impacts. To address the continuing and accelerating alterations that climate change is bringing to SESs, adaptive governance generally will require more flexibility than prior governance institutions have often allowed. However, to function as good governance, adaptive governance must pay real attention to the problem of how to balance this increased need for flexibility with continuing governance stability so that it can foster adaptation to change without being perceived or experienced as perpetually destabilizing, disruptive, and unfair. Flexibility and stability serve different purposes in governance, and a variety of tools exist to strike different balances between them while still preserving the governance institution's legitimacy among the people governed. After reviewing those purposes and the implications of climate change for environmental governance, we examine psychological insights into the structuring of adaptive governance and the variety of legal tools available to incorporate those insights into adaptive governance regimes. Because the substantive goals of governance systems will differ among specific systems, we do not purport to comment on what the normative or substantive goals of law should be. Instead, we conclude that attention to process and procedure (including participation), as well as increased use of substantive standards (instead of rules), may allow an increased level of substantive flexibility to operate with legitimacy and fairness, providing the requisite levels of psychological, social, and economic stability needed for communities to adapt successfully to the Anthropocene.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive governance; balance; due process; equity; fairness; legitimacy; nonequilibrium; procedure; resilience; rule; standard

Year:  2017        PMID: 29780429      PMCID: PMC5954424          DOI: 10.5751/ES-08983-220203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Soc            Impact factor:   4.403


  11 in total

1.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems.

Authors:  M Scheffer; S Carpenter; J A Foley; C Folke; B Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation.

Authors:  Susanne C Moser; Julia A Ekstrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?

Authors:  Richard M Ryan; Edward L Deci
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2006-12

4.  A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas.

Authors:  Elinor Ostrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Climate change. Stationarity is dead: whither water management?

Authors:  P C D Milly; Julio Betancourt; Malin Falkenmark; Robert M Hirsch; Zbigniew W Kundzewicz; Dennis P Lettenmaier; Ronald J Stouffer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Social-psychological principles of community-based conservation and conservancy motivation: attaining goals within an autonomy-supportive environment.

Authors:  Daniel Decaro; Michael Stokes
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.

Authors:  Craig D Parks; Jeff Joireman; Paul A M Van Lange
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2013-12

8.  Psycho-social processes in dealing with legal innovation in the community: insights from biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Paula Castro; Carla Mouro
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2011-06

9.  Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet.

Authors:  Will Steffen; Katherine Richardson; Johan Rockström; Sarah E Cornell; Ingo Fetzer; Elena M Bennett; Reinette Biggs; Stephen R Carpenter; Wim de Vries; Cynthia A de Wit; Carl Folke; Dieter Gerten; Jens Heinke; Georgina M Mace; Linn M Persson; Veerabhadran Ramanathan; Belinda Reyers; Sverker Sörlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality.

Authors:  G Hardin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Environmental hazards, rigid institutions, and transformative change: How drought affects the consideration of water and climate impacts in infrastructure management.

Authors:  Nicola Ulibarri; Tyler A Scott
Journal:  Glob Environ Change       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 9.523

2.  The improvement on the implementation level of environmental policies is demanded in China.

Authors:  Tongzhu Zhang; Hong Yao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Untapped capacity for resilience in environmental law.

Authors:  Ahjond Garmestani; J B Ruhl; Brian C Chaffin; Robin K Craig; Helena F M W van Rijswick; David G Angeler; Carl Folke; Lance Gunderson; Dirac Twidwell; Craig R Allen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Governing complexity: Integrating science, governance, and law to manage accelerating change in the globalized commons.

Authors:  Barbara Cosens; J B Ruhl; Niko Soininen; Lance Gunderson; Antti Belinskij; Thorsten Blenckner; Alejandro E Camacho; Brian C Chaffin; Robin Kundis Craig; Holly Doremus; Robert Glicksman; Anna-Stiina Heiskanen; Rhett Larson; Jukka Similä
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.