Literature DB >> 29780283

Adaptation and application of multivariate AMBI (M-AMBI) in US coastal waters.

Marguerite C Pelletier1, David J Gillett2, Anna Hamilton3, Treda Grayson4, Virginia Hansen5, Erik W Leppo3, Stephan B Weisberg2, Angel Borja6.   

Abstract

The multivariate AMBI (M-AMBI) is an extension of the AZTI Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) that has been used extensively in Europe, but not in the United States. In a previous study, we adapted AMBI for use in US coastal waters (US AMBI), but saw biases in salinity and score distribution when compared to locally calibrated indices. In this study we modified M-AMBI for US waters and compared its performance to that of US AMBI. Index performance was evaluated in three ways: 1) concordance with local indices presently being used as management tools in three geographic regions of US coastal waters, 2) classification accuracy for sites defined a priori as good or bad and 3) insensitivity to natural environmental gradients. US M-AMBI was highly correlated with all three local indices and removed the compression in response seen in moderately disturbed sites with US AMBI. US M-AMBI and US AMBI did a similar job correctly classifying sites as good or bad in local validation datasets (83 to 100% accuracy vs. 84 to 95%, respectively). US M-AMBI also removed the salinity bias of US AMBI so that lower salinity sites were not more likely to be incorrectly classified as impaired. The US M-AMBI appears to be an acceptable index for comparing condition across broad-scales such as estuarine and coastal waters surveyed by the US EPA's National Coastal Condition Assessment, and may be applicable to areas of the US coast that do not have a locally derived benthic index.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benthic index; coastal assessment; estuary; invertebrates

Year:  2018        PMID: 29780283      PMCID: PMC5954435          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Indic        ISSN: 1470-160X            Impact factor:   4.958


  14 in total

1.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.

Authors:  John L Stoddard; David P Larsen; Charles P Hawkins; Richard K Johnson; Richard H Norris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  The Estuarine Quality Paradox, Environmental Homeostasis and the difficulty of detecting anthropogenic stress in naturally stressed areas.

Authors:  Michael Elliott; Victor Quintino
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  The estuarine quality paradox: Is it possible to define an ecological quality status for specific modified and naturally stressed estuarine ecosystems?

Authors:  Jean-Claude Dauvin; Thierry Ruellet
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Transitional and freshwater bioassessments: one site, two perspectives?

Authors:  J M Neto; M J Feio; H Teixeira; J Patrício; S R Q Serra; J N Franco; A R Calapez; E Constantino
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 5.553

5.  Assessing coastal benthic macrofauna community condition using best professional judgement--developing consensus across North America and Europe.

Authors:  Heliana Teixeira; Angel Borja; Stephen B Weisberg; J Ananda Ranasinghe; Donald B Cadien; Daniel M Dauer; Jean-Claude Dauvin; Steven Degraer; Robert J Diaz; Antoine Grémare; Ioannis Karakassis; Roberto J Llansó; Lawrence L Lovell; João C Marques; David E Montagne; Anna Occhipinti-Ambrogi; Rutger Rosenberg; Rafael Sardá; Linda C Schaffner; Ronald G Velarde
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  Quality assessment of benthic macroinvertebrates under the scope of WFD using BAT, the Benthic Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Heliana Teixeira; João Magalhães Neto; Joana Patrício; Helena Veríssimo; Rute Pinto; Fuensanta Salas; João Carlos Marques
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 5.553

7.  Is there a possibility of ranking benthic quality assessment indices to select the most responsive to different human pressures?

Authors:  Ángel Borja; Sandra L Marín; Iñigo Muxika; Loreto Pino; José G Rodríguez
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 5.553

8.  Benthic macrofaunal assemblages of the San Francisco Estuary and Delta, USA.

Authors:  Bruce Thompson; J Ananda Ranasinghe; Sarah Lowe; Aroon Melwani; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Can sediment total organic carbon and grain size be used to diagnose organic enrichment in estuaries?

Authors:  Marguerite C Pelletier; Daniel E Campbell; Kay T Ho; Robert M Burgess; Charles T Audette; Naomi E Detenbeck
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Using historical data, expert judgement and multivariate analysis in assessing reference conditions and benthic ecological status, according to the European Water Framework Directive.

Authors:  Iñigo Muxika; Angel Borja; Juan Bald
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 5.553

View more
  2 in total

1.  Landscape structure and land use affect estuarine benthic invertebrates in the Virginian Biogeographic Province, USA.

Authors:  Marguerite C Pelletier; Arthur J Gold; Jane Copeland; Liliana Gonzalez; Peter V August
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  A Quantitative Assessment of Organic Carbon Content as a Regional Sediment-Condition Indicator.

Authors:  Walter G Nelson
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.958

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.