OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term impact of 2 promising intervention approaches to engage pharmacy personnel (pharmacists, technicians) in referring patients who want to quit smoking to the tobacco quitline. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: Community pharmacies in Connecticut (n = 32) and Washington (n = 32). INTERVENTION: Two intervention approaches were evaluated: academic detailing (AD), which involved on-site training for pharmacy staff about the quitline, versus mailed quitline materials (MM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the overall percentage of quitline registrants who reported hearing about the quitline from any pharmacy during the 6-month baseline monitoring period versus the 12-month intervention period, and between-group comparisons of a) the number of quitline registrants who reported hearing about the quitline from one of the study pharmacies during the 12-month intervention period, and b) the number of quitline cards and brochures distributed to patients during the first 6 months of the intervention period. RESULTS: The percentage of quitline callers who reported having heard about the quitline from a pharmacy increased significantly, from 2.2% during the baseline monitoring period to 3.8% during the 12-month intervention (P < 0.0001). In addition, comparisons controlled for seasonal effects also revealed significant increases in referrals. Across all 64 pharmacies, 10,013 quitline cards and 4755 brochures were distributed. The number of quitline cards distributed and the number registrants who reported hearing about the quitline from a pharmacy did not differ by intervention approach (AD vs. MM), although AD pharmacies distributed more quitline brochures (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Brief cessation interventions are feasible in community pharmacies, and the 2 approaches evaluated for engaging pharmacy personnel were similarly effective and collectively led to meaningful increases in the number and proportion of all patients who called the quitline. Involvement of community pharmacy personnel in tobacco cessation presents a significant opportunity to promote quitline services by connecting patients with an effective publicly available resource.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term impact of 2 promising intervention approaches to engage pharmacy personnel (pharmacists, technicians) in referring patients who want to quit smoking to the tobacco quitline. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: Community pharmacies in Connecticut (n = 32) and Washington (n = 32). INTERVENTION: Two intervention approaches were evaluated: academic detailing (AD), which involved on-site training for pharmacy staff about the quitline, versus mailed quitline materials (MM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the overall percentage of quitline registrants who reported hearing about the quitline from any pharmacy during the 6-month baseline monitoring period versus the 12-month intervention period, and between-group comparisons of a) the number of quitline registrants who reported hearing about the quitline from one of the study pharmacies during the 12-month intervention period, and b) the number of quitline cards and brochures distributed to patients during the first 6 months of the intervention period. RESULTS: The percentage of quitline callers who reported having heard about the quitline from a pharmacy increased significantly, from 2.2% during the baseline monitoring period to 3.8% during the 12-month intervention (P < 0.0001). In addition, comparisons controlled for seasonal effects also revealed significant increases in referrals. Across all 64 pharmacies, 10,013 quitline cards and 4755 brochures were distributed. The number of quitline cards distributed and the number registrants who reported hearing about the quitline from a pharmacy did not differ by intervention approach (AD vs. MM), although AD pharmacies distributed more quitline brochures (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Brief cessation interventions are feasible in community pharmacies, and the 2 approaches evaluated for engaging pharmacy personnel were similarly effective and collectively led to meaningful increases in the number and proportion of all patients who called the quitline. Involvement of community pharmacy personnel in tobacco cessation presents a significant opportunity to promote quitline services by connecting patients with an effective publicly available resource.
Authors: Scott A Baggarly; Tara L Jenkins; Gina C Biglane; Gregory W Smith; Connie M Smith; Benny L Blaylock Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Alexander V Prokhorov; Karen Suchanek Hudmon; Salma Marani; Lewis Foxhall; Kentya H Ford; Nancy Stancic Luca; David W Wetter; Scott B Cantor; Frank Vitale; Ellen R Gritz Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-10-11
Authors: Robin L Corelli; Alan J Zillich; Carl de Moor; Margherita R Giuliano; Jennifer Arnold; Christine M Fenlon; Cami L Douglas; Brooke Magnusson; Susan M Zbikowski; Alexander V Prokhorov; Karen Suchanek Hudmon Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2012-07-27
Authors: M A O'Brien; S Rogers; G Jamtvedt; A D Oxman; J Odgaard-Jensen; D T Kristoffersen; L Forsetlund; D Bainbridge; N Freemantle; D A Davis; R B Haynes; E L Harvey Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2007-10-17
Authors: Robin L Corelli; Christine M Fenlon; Lisa A Kroon; Alexander V Prokhorov; Karen Suchanek Hudmon Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Katy Ellis Hilts; Robin L Corelli; Alexander V Prokhorov; Susan M Zbikowski; Alan J Zillich; Karen Suchanek Hudmon Journal: Pharmacy (Basel) Date: 2022-05-30
Authors: Sarah J Ball; Jenna A McCauley; Megan Pruitt; Jingwen Zhang; Justin Marsden; Kelly S Barth; Patrick D Mauldin; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; William P Moran Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) Date: 2021-03-03