Literature DB >> 29779925

The application of p2PSA% and prostate health index in prostate cancer detection: A prospective cohort in a Tertiary Medical Center.

Yung-Ting Cheng1, Chih-Hung Chiang2, Yeong-Shiau Pu1, Shih Ping Liu1, Yu-Chuang Lu1, Yi-Kai Chang1, Hong-Chiang Chang1, Kuo-How Huang1, Yuan-Ju Lee1, Po-Ming Chow1, Shih-Chun Hung1, Chao-Yuan Huang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) with low specificity that causes unnecessary prostate biopsies increases clinical morbidities, psychological stress, and medical expenses. We aimed to test the accuracy and cutoff value of Prostate Health Index (PHI) in men for prostate cancer detection.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 213 men who underwent prostate biopsy with PSA≦10 ng/ml or abnormal findings on digital rectal examination. Total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA) and p2PSA levels were measured by serum samples before prostate biopsy. PHI was calculated as (p2PSA/fPSA) × √tPSA. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to predict the risk of cancer and detect clinically significant prostate cancer.
RESULTS: 33 (27.0%) patients were confirmed with the diagnoses of prostate cancer by prostate biopsy. The levels of p2PSA, %p2PSA, and PHI showed statistically significant differences between prostate cancer patients and non-cancer patients. %p2PSA and PHI had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.723 and 0.772 (both p < 0.001), respectively, predicting cancer detection at biopsy than other predictors (tPSA, fPSA, %fPSA, and PSA density (AUC: 0.544, 0.538, 0.593, and 0.664, respectively). In multivariable logistic regression, %p2PSA had a statistical significant odds ratio 8.51 (p = 0.003) and PHI had an odds ratio with marginal significance 4.18 (p = 0.06).
CONCLUSION: %p2PSA and PHI increased the diagnostic accuracy with significantly greater sensitivity and specificity than tPSA. We determined an optimal cut-off value of PHI among Taiwanese population. These findings support the usefulness in the decisional process of prostate biopsy.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian continental ancestry group; Biomarkers; Prostate specific antigen; Prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29779925     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc        ISSN: 0929-6646            Impact factor:   3.282


  3 in total

1.  Explication of the roles of prostate health index (PHI) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) as diagnostic and predictor tools for prostate cancer in equivocal PSA range of 4-10 ng/mL.

Authors:  Anmar M Nassir; Hala F M Kamel
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate Health Index in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Shih-Ting Chiu; Yung-Ting Cheng; Yeong-Shiau Pu; Yu-Chuan Lu; Jian-Hua Hong; Shiu-Dong Chung; Chih-Hung Chiang; Chao-Yuan Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Prostate Health Index and Prostate Health Index Density as Diagnostic Tools for Improved Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Marija Barisiene; Arnas Bakavicius; Diana Stanciute; Jolita Jurkeviciene; Arunas Zelvys; Albertas Ulys; Dalius Vitkus; Feliksas Jankevicius
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.