Rocco Barazzoni1, Gianluca Gortan Cappellari2, Annamaria Semolic2, Mario Ius2, Michela Zanetti2, Antonio Gabrielli3, Pierandrea Vinci2, Gianfranco Guarnieri2, Giorgio Simon3. 1. Dept. of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Italy; Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy. Electronic address: barazzon@units.it. 2. Dept. of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Italy; Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy. 3. Azienda per l'Assistenza Sanitaria n. 5, Pordenone, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Waist circumference (WC) is the currently recommended marker of central fat for cardiometabolic risk screening. Alternative surrogate markers have been recently proposed to better reflect the metabolic impact of central fat accumulation per se, based on WC normalization by height (Weight-to-Height Ratio - WtoH; Body Roundness Index - BRI) or body mass index (BMI) without (A Body Shape Index - ABSI) or with inclusion of plasma triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol concentrations (Visceral Adiposity Index - VAI). METHODS: We investigated associations between WtoH, BRI, ABSI or VAI and insulin resistance (HOMA-index) or metabolic syndrome (MetS) in a general population cohort from the North-East Italy Mo.Ma. study (n = 1965, age = 49 ± 13 years, BMI = 26.7 ± 5.2 kg/m2). Baseline values were also evaluated as predictors of future insulin resistance and MetS in overweight-obese individuals undergoing 5-year follow-up (Ow-Ob) (n = 263; age = 54 ± 9, BMI = 30,7 ± 4,1). RESULTS: Compared to WC or BMI, basal WtoH and BRI were similarly associated with baseline HOMA and MetS prevalence after multiple adjustments (P < 0.001) and all markers similarly predicted 5-year HOMA and MetS (P < 0.001). Under basal conditions, superimposable results were observed for VAI whereas ABSI was less accurate or unable to identify baseline HOMA and MetS (p < 0.05 vs WtoH-BRI-VAI-WC-BMI). VAI had highest 5-year risk predictive value in Ow-Ob [ROC Area Under the Curve (AUC) VAI > WtoH-BRI-WC-BMI; p < 0.05] while no predictive value was in contrast observed for ABSI (ROC AUC ABSI < WtoH-BRI-WC-BMI; p < 0.05). Using alternate formulae with plasma lipid inclusion in ABSI and removal from VAI calculations completely reversed their 5-year predictive value and AUC. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings do not support replacement of WC with height-normalized anthropometric central fat surrogate markers to predict cardiometabolic risk in the general and overweight-obese population. BMI-normalization impairs risk assessment unless plasma lipid concentrations are available and included in calculations.
BACKGROUND: Waist circumference (WC) is the currently recommended marker of central fat for cardiometabolic risk screening. Alternative surrogate markers have been recently proposed to better reflect the metabolic impact of central fat accumulation per se, based on WC normalization by height (Weight-to-Height Ratio - WtoH; Body Roundness Index - BRI) or body mass index (BMI) without (A Body Shape Index - ABSI) or with inclusion of plasma triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol concentrations (Visceral Adiposity Index - VAI). METHODS: We investigated associations between WtoH, BRI, ABSI or VAI and insulin resistance (HOMA-index) or metabolic syndrome (MetS) in a general population cohort from the North-East Italy Mo.Ma. study (n = 1965, age = 49 ± 13 years, BMI = 26.7 ± 5.2 kg/m2). Baseline values were also evaluated as predictors of future insulin resistance and MetS in overweight-obese individuals undergoing 5-year follow-up (Ow-Ob) (n = 263; age = 54 ± 9, BMI = 30,7 ± 4,1). RESULTS: Compared to WC or BMI, basal WtoH and BRI were similarly associated with baseline HOMA and MetS prevalence after multiple adjustments (P < 0.001) and all markers similarly predicted 5-year HOMA and MetS (P < 0.001). Under basal conditions, superimposable results were observed for VAI whereas ABSI was less accurate or unable to identify baseline HOMA and MetS (p < 0.05 vs WtoH-BRI-VAI-WC-BMI). VAI had highest 5-year risk predictive value in Ow-Ob [ROC Area Under the Curve (AUC) VAI > WtoH-BRI-WC-BMI; p < 0.05] while no predictive value was in contrast observed for ABSI (ROC AUC ABSI < WtoH-BRI-WC-BMI; p < 0.05). Using alternate formulae with plasma lipid inclusion in ABSI and removal from VAI calculations completely reversed their 5-year predictive value and AUC. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings do not support replacement of WC with height-normalized anthropometric central fat surrogate markers to predict cardiometabolic risk in the general and overweight-obese population. BMI-normalization impairs risk assessment unless plasma lipid concentrations are available and included in calculations.
Authors: Valter Paulo Neves Miranda; Paulo Roberto Dos Santos Amorim; Ronaldo Rocha Bastos; Eliane Rodrigues de Faria; Maria Eliza de Castro Moreira; Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini; Maria do Carmo Gouveia Peluzio; Célia Lucia de Luces Fortes Ferreira; Silvia Eloiza Priore Journal: Mediators Inflamm Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 4.711