Literature DB >> 29779607

Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.

Barbara Ohlenforst1, Dorothea Wendt2, Sophia E Kramer3, Graham Naylor4, Adriana A Zekveld5, Thomas Lunner6.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that activating the noise reduction scheme in hearing aids results in a smaller peak pupil dilation (PPD), indicating reduced listening effort, at 50% and 95% correct sentence recognition with a 4-talker masker. The objective of this study was to measure the effect of the noise reduction scheme (on or off) on PPD and sentence recognition across a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) from +16 dB to -12 dB and two masker types (4-talker and stationary noise). Relatively low PPDs were observed at very low (-12 dB) and very high (+16 dB to +8 dB) SNRs presumably due to 'giving up' and 'easy listening', respectively. The maximum PPD was observed with SNRs at approximately 50% correct sentence recognition. Sentence recognition with both masker types was significantly improved by the noise reduction scheme, which corresponds to the shift in performance from SNR function at approximately 5 dB toward a lower SNR. This intelligibility effect was accompanied by a corresponding effect on the PPD, shifting the peak by approximately 4 dB toward a lower SNR. In addition, with the 4-talker masker, when the noise reduction scheme was active, the PPD was smaller overall than that when the scheme was inactive. We conclude that with the 4-talker masker, noise reduction scheme processing provides a listening effort benefit in addition to any effect associated with improved intelligibility. Thus, the effect of the noise reduction scheme on listening effort incorporates more than can be explained by intelligibility alone, emphasizing the potential importance of measuring listening effort in addition to traditional speech reception measures.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Hearing aids; Hearing impairment; Listening effort; Noise reduction scheme; Pupil dilation; Signal-to-noise ratio; Speech recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29779607     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.

Authors:  Lou Seropian; Mathieu Ferschneider; Fanny Cholvy; Christophe Micheyl; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Annie Moulin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Effect of Noise Reduction on Cortical Speech-in-Noise Processing and Its Variance due to Individual Noise Tolerance.

Authors:  Subong Kim; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Hari M Bharadwaj; Inyong Choi
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Effect of Speech-to-Noise Ratio and Luminance on a Range of Current and Potential Pupil Response Measures to Assess Listening Effort.

Authors:  Patrycja Książek; Adriana A Zekveld; Dorothea Wendt; Lorenz Fiedler; Thomas Lunner; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 4.  Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Dorothea Wendt; Thomas Koelewijn; Stefanie E Kuchinsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Autonomic Nervous System Correlates of Speech Categorization Revealed Through Pupillometry.

Authors:  Gwyneth A Lewis; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Neural Representation Enhanced for Speech and Reduced for Background Noise With a Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Scheme During a Selective Attention Task.

Authors:  Emina Alickovic; Thomas Lunner; Dorothea Wendt; Lorenz Fiedler; Renskje Hietkamp; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Carina Graversen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Effects of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Early and Late Cortical Representations of Competing Talkers in Noise.

Authors:  Emina Alickovic; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Lorenz Fiedler; Sébastien Santurette; Hamish Innes-Brown; Carina Graversen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.

Authors:  Andreea Micula; Jerker Rönnberg; Lorenz Fiedler; Dorothea Wendt; Maria Cecilie Jørgensen; Ditte Katrine Larsen; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Pupil Dilation Is Sensitive to Semantic Ambiguity and Acoustic Degradation.

Authors:  Mason Kadem; Björn Herrmann; Jennifer M Rodd; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Three New Outcome Measures That Tap Into Cognitive Processes Required for Real-Life Communication.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner; Emina Alickovic; Carina Graversen; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Dorothea Wendt; Gitte Keidser
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.