| Literature DB >> 29779605 |
Steve M Redpath1, Aidan Keane2, Henrik Andrén3, Zachary Baynham-Herd2, Nils Bunnefeld4, A Bradley Duthie4, Jens Frank3, Claude A Garcia5, Johan Månsson3, Lovisa Nilsson3, Chris R J Pollard4, O Sarobidy Rakotonarivo4, Carl F Salk6, Henry Travers7.
Abstract
Conservation conflicts represent complex multilayered problems that are challenging to study. We explore the utility of theoretical, experimental, and constructivist approaches to games to help to understand and manage these challenges. We show how these approaches can help to develop theory, understand patterns in conflict, and highlight potentially effective management solutions. The choice of approach should be guided by the research question and by whether the focus is on testing hypotheses, predicting behaviour, or engaging stakeholders. Games provide an exciting opportunity to help to unravel the complexity in conflicts, while researchers need an awareness of the limitations and ethical constraints involved. Given the opportunities, this field will benefit from greater investment and development.Keywords: conflicts; conservation; constructivist games; experimental games; game theory; role-playing
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29779605 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Ecol Evol ISSN: 0169-5347 Impact factor: 17.712