Áine Travers1, Tracey McDonagh2, Ask Elklit2. 1. Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark. atravers@health.sdu.dk. 2. Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper aims to synthesize research relating to youth responses to school shootings between 2014 and 2017. The main questions it addresses are how such events impact young people psychologically, and what risk or protective factors may contribute to different trajectories of recovery? RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research suggests that most young people exposed to school shootings demonstrate resilience, exhibiting no long-term dysfunction. However, a minority will experience severe and chronic symptoms. The likelihood of experiencing clinically significant reactions is influenced by pre-trauma functioning as well as peri-traumatic and post-traumatic factors. These include proximity to the trauma, peri-traumatic dissociation, post-traumatic emotional regulation difficulties, social support, and flexibility of coping styles. Research that separates the distinguishing features of young people with differing recovery styles is vital to tailor intervention. But methodological and design issues associated with such research necessitates caution in drawing conclusions. Variation in definitions and measures and the self-report nature of many of the studies are potential sources of bias. Greater uniformity across designs would enhance confidence and allow for improved evidence-based intervention.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper aims to synthesize research relating to youth responses to school shootings between 2014 and 2017. The main questions it addresses are how such events impact young people psychologically, and what risk or protective factors may contribute to different trajectories of recovery? RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research suggests that most young people exposed to school shootings demonstrate resilience, exhibiting no long-term dysfunction. However, a minority will experience severe and chronic symptoms. The likelihood of experiencing clinically significant reactions is influenced by pre-trauma functioning as well as peri-traumatic and post-traumatic factors. These include proximity to the trauma, peri-traumatic dissociation, post-traumatic emotional regulation difficulties, social support, and flexibility of coping styles. Research that separates the distinguishing features of young people with differing recovery styles is vital to tailor intervention. But methodological and design issues associated with such research necessitates caution in drawing conclusions. Variation in definitions and measures and the self-report nature of many of the studies are potential sources of bias. Greater uniformity across designs would enhance confidence and allow for improved evidence-based intervention.
Entities:
Keywords:
Extreme trauma; Mass shootings; Post-shooting interventions; School shooting consequences; School shooting victims; School shootings
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-02
Authors: James M Shultz; Siri Thoresen; Brian W Flynn; Glenn W Muschert; Jon A Shaw; Zelde Espinel; Frank G Walter; Joshua B Gaither; Yanira Garcia-Barcena; Kaitlin O'Keefe; Alyssa M Cohen Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Maya Rossin-Slater; Molly Schnell; Hannes Schwandt; Sam Trejo; Lindsey Uniat Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 11.205