Literature DB >> 29779039

Differences between traumatic and non-traumatic causes of ACL revision surgery.

Vera Jaecker1, Tabea Zapf1, Jan-Hendrik Naendrup1, Ajay C Kanakamedala2, Thomas Pfeiffer1, Sven Shafizadeh3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and classify causes for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure. It was hypothesized that specific technical and biological reconstruction aspects would differ when comparing traumatic and non-traumatic ACL reconstruction failures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients who experienced ACL reconstruction failure and underwent revision between 2009 and 2014 were analyzed. Based on a systematic failure analysis, including evaluation of technical information on primary ACL reconstruction and radiological assessment of tunnel positions, causes were classified into traumatic and non-traumatic mechanisms of failure; non-traumatic mechanisms were further sub-divided into technical and biologic causes. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and chi-squared tests were performed to determine differences between groups based on various factors including graft choice, fixation technique, technique of femoral tunnel positioning, tunnel malpositioning, and time to revision.
RESULTS: Non-traumatic, i.e., technical, and traumatic mechanisms of ACL reconstruction failure were found in 64.5 and 29.1% of patients, respectively. Biological failure was found only in 6.4% of patients. Non-anatomical femoral tunnel positioning was found the most common cause (83.1%) for technical reconstruction failure followed by non-anatomical tibial tunnel positioning (45.1%). There were strong correlations between non-traumatic technical failure and femoral tunnel malpositioning, transtibial femoral tunnel drilling techniques, femoral transfixation techniques as well as earlier graft failure (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Technical causes, particularly tunnel malpositioning, were significantly correlated with increased incidence of non-traumatic ACL reconstruction failure. Transtibial femoral tunnel positioning techniques and femoral transfixation techniques, showed an increased incidence of non-traumatic, earlier graft failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); Femoral transfixation techniques; Revision; Transtibial femoral tunnel positioning; Tunnel positioning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29779039     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-2954-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  6 in total

Review 1.  Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dan Cohen; Patrick Fangping Yao; Abhilash Uddandam; Darren de Sa; Michelle E Arakgi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 2.  Revision ACL Reconstruction: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  [Mid-term effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament revision].

Authors:  Xing Yun; Yu Wei; Zhongli Li; Yujie Liu; Zhigang Wang; Qiang Zhang; Yang Liu; Min Wei
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

4.  Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair.

Authors:  B Schliemann; C Kösters; J Glasbrenner; M Fischer; M J Raschke; T Briese; M Müller; E Herbst; C Kittl
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Increase in cartilage degeneration in all knee compartments after failed ACL reconstruction at 4 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kathleen Andrä; Robert Prill; Enes Kayaalp; Lars Irlenbusch; Eckehard Liesaus; Tilo Trommer; Peter Ullmann; Roland Becker
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sven Vetter; Philipp von der Linden; Paul-Alfred Grützner; Jan von Recum
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-09-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.