| Literature DB >> 29778180 |
Longfei Zhang1, Xun Wu1, Zilong Huang1, Nan Zhang1, Yuzhi Wu1, Qinren Cai2, Xiangguang Shen1, Huanzhong Ding3.
Abstract
To evaluate the relationship between the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters and the antibacterial effect of cefquinome against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, a tissue cage infection model was established in piglets. In this model, an initial count of A. pleuropneumoniae of approximately 106 CFU/mL was exposed to different concentrations of cefquinome after multiple administration at dosages of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1, 2, 4 mg/kg body weight once a day for 3 days. Concentration of cefquinome and bacterial numbers of A. pleuropneumoniae in the tissue-cage fluid (TCF) were monitered. An inhibitory form of sigmoid maximum effect (Emax) model was used to estimate the relationship between the antibacterial effect and PK/PD indices of cefquinome against A. pleuropneumoniae. The minimum inhibitory concentration of cefquinome against A. pleuropneumoniae was 0.016 μg/mL in TCF. The total maximum antibacterial effect was a 3.96 log10 (CFU/mL) reduction. In addition, the cumulative percentage of time over a 24 h period that the drug concentration exceeds the MIC (%T > MIC) was the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) index that best correlated with the antibacterial efficacy (R2 = 0.967). The estimated %T > MIC values were 11.59, 27.49, and 59.81% for a 1/3-log10 (CFU/mL) reduction, a 2/3-log10 (CFU/mL) reduction, and a 1-log10 (CFU/mL) reduction, respectively, during the 24h administration period of cefquinome. In conclusion, cefquinome exhibits excellent antibacterial activity and time-dependent characteristics against A. pleuropneumoniae in vivo. Furthermore, these data provide meaningful guidance to optimize regimens of cefquinome to treat respiratory tract infections caused by A. pleuropneumoniae.Entities:
Keywords: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae; Cefquinome; In vivo; PK/PD parameters; Tissue cage infection model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29778180 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Microbiol ISSN: 0378-1135 Impact factor: 3.293