Literature DB >> 29777612

Clustering of job strain, effort-reward imbalance, and organizational injustice and the risk of work disability: a cohort study.

Anne Juvani1, Tuula Oksanen, Marianna Virtanen, Paula Salo, Jaana Pentti, Mika Kivimäki, Jussi Vahtera.   

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the association between co-occurring work stressors and risk of disability pension. Methods The work stressors job strain, effort-reward imbalance (ERI), and organizational injustice were measured by a survey in 2008 of 41 862 employees linked to national records of all-cause and cause-specific disability pensions until 2011. Co-occurring work stressors were examined as risk factors of work disability using Cox regression marginal models. Results Work stressors were clustered: 50.8% had no work stressors [observed-to-expected ratio (O/E)=1.2], 27.4% were exposed to one stressor (O/E=0.61-0.81), 17.7% to two stressors (O/E=0.91-1.73) and 6.4% to all three stressors (O/E=2.59). During a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, 976 disability pensions were granted. Compared to employees with no work stressors, those with (i) co-occurring strain and ERI or (ii) strain, ERI and injustice had a 1.9-2.1-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-2.6] increased risk of disability retirement. The corresponding hazard ratios were 1.2 and 1.5 (95% CI 1.0-1.8) for strain and ERI alone. Risk of disability pension from depressive disorders was 4.4-4.7-fold (95% CI 2.4-8.0) for combinations of strain+ERI and strain+ERI+injustice, and 1.9-2.5-fold (95% CI 1.1-4.0) for strain and ERI alone. For musculoskeletal disorders, disability risk was 1.6-1.9-fold (95% CI 1.3-2.3) for strain+ERI and ERI+injustice combinations, and 1.3-fold (95% CI 1.0-1.7) for strain alone. Supplementary analyses with work stressors determined using work-unit aggregates supported these findings. Conclusions Work stressors tend to cluster in the same individuals. The highest risk of disability pension was observed among those with work stressor combinations strain+ERI or strain+ERI+injustice, rather than for those with single stressors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29777612     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  9 in total

1.  The association between effort-reward imbalance, work-life balance and depressive mood in Korean wage workers: The 4th Korean Working Conditions Survey.

Authors:  Hyun-Mook Lim; Cham-Jin Park; Ji-Hoo Yook; Min-Seok Kim; Ho-Yeon Kim; Yun-Chul Hong
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-01-25

2.  Psychosocial Stressors at Work and the Risk of Sickness Absence Due to a Diagnosed Mental Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline S Duchaine; Karine Aubé; Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet; Michel Vézina; Ruth Ndjaboué; Victoria Massamba; Denis Talbot; Mathilde Lavigne-Robichaud; Xavier Trudel; Ana-Paula Bruno Pena-Gralle; Alain Lesage; Lynne Moore; Alain Milot; Danielle Laurin; Chantal Brisson
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  Association between work ability and work stressors: cross-sectional survey of elderly services and health and social care service employees.

Authors:  Kirsikka Selander; Risto Nikunlaakso; Jaana Laitinen
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-03-15

4.  The Moderating Effects of Social Media Activities on the Relationship Between Effort-Reward Imbalance and Health and Wellbeing: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry in Malaysia.

Authors:  Noreen Kanwal; Ahmad Shahrul Nizam Isha
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18

5.  Psychosocial work environment as a dynamic network: a multi-wave cohort study.

Authors:  Marko Elovainio; Christian Hakulinen; Kaisla Komulainen; Mika Kivimäki; Marianna Virtanen; Jenni Ervasti; Tuula Oksanen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Psychosocial working conditions, trajectories of disability, and the mediating role of cognitive decline and chronic diseases: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Kuan-Yu Pan; Weili Xu; Francesca Mangialasche; Rui Wang; Serhiy Dekhtyar; Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga; Laura Fratiglioni; Hui-Xin Wang
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  The association between serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) levels and job-related stress among female nurses.

Authors:  Seunghyeon Cho; Won-Ju Park; Wonyang Kang; Hyeong-Min Lim; Ji-Sung Ahn; Dae-Young Lim; Jai-Dong Moon
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-08-14

8.  Self-reported health problems in a health risk appraisal predict permanent work disability: a prospective cohort study of 22,023 employees from different sectors in Finland with up to 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  Minna Pihlajamäki; Jukka Uitti; Heikki Arola; Mikko Korhonen; Tapio Nummi; Simo Taimela
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Description and application of a method to quantify criterion-related cut-off values for questionnaire-based psychosocial risk assessment.

Authors:  Mathias Diebig; Peter Angerer
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.015

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.