Literature DB >> 29777587

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) density may not be the only determinant for the efficacy of EGFR-targeted photoimmunotherapy in human head and neck cancer cell lines.

Wei Peng1,2, Henriette S de Bruijn2, Eric Farrell3, Mouldy Sioud4, Vida Mashayekhi5, Sabrina Oliveira5,6, Go M van Dam7, Jan L N Roodenburg1, Max J H Witjes1, Dominic J Robinson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of targeted photoimmunotherapy (PIT) in vitro on cell lines with various expression levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) using an anti-EGFR targeted conjugate composed of Cetuximab and IR700DX, phthalocyanine dye.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relative EGFR density and cell binding assay was conducted in three human head & neck cancer cell lines (scc-U2, scc-U8, and OSC19) and one reference cell line A431. After incubation with the conjugate for 1 or 24 hours, cellular uptake and localization were investigated by confocal laser scanning microscopy and quantified by image analysis. Cell survival was determined using the MTS assay and alamarBlue assay after PIT with a 690 nm laser to a dose of 7 J.cm-2 (at 5 mW.cm-2 ). The mode of cell death was examined with flow cytometry using apoptosis/necrosis staining by Annexin V/propidium iodide, together with immunoblots of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL.
RESULTS: A431 cells had the highest EGFR density followed by OSC19, and then scc-U2 and scc-U8. The conjugates were localized both on the surface and in the cytosol of the cells after 1- and 24-hour incubation. After 24-hour incubation the granular pattern was more pronounced and in a similar pattern of a lysosomal probe, suggesting that the uptake of conjugates by cells was via receptor-mediated endocytosis. The results obtained from the quantitative imaging analysis correlate with the level of EGFR expression. Targeted PIT killed scc-U8 and A431 cells efficiently; while scc-U2 and OSC19 were less sensitive to this treatment, despite having similar EGFR density, uptake and localization pattern. Scc-U2 cells showed less apoptotic cell dealth than in A431 after 24-hour targeted PIT. Immunoblots showed significantly higher expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL proteins in scc-U2 cell lines compared to scc-U8.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the effectiveness of EGFR targeted PIT is not only dependent upon EGFR density. Intrinsic biological properties of tumor cell lines also play a role in determining the efficacy of targeted PIT. We have shown that in scc-U2 cells this difference may be caused by differences in the apoptopic pathway. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:513-522, 2018.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cetuximab-IR700DX conjugate; epidermal growth factor receptor; head and neck cancer; photoimmunotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29777587     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  8 in total

1.  Effect of the association of infra-red and red wavelength photobiomodulation therapy on the healing of post-extraction sockets of third lower molars: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Davisson Alves Pereira; Pedro Gomes Junqueira Mendes; Samara de Souza Santos; Gabriella Lopes de Rezende Barbosa; Roberto Sales E Pessoa; Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Efficacy of concentrated growth factor with low-level laser for the regeneration of interdental papilla defects.

Authors:  Ziling Chen; Di Miao; Le Zhang; Liangqiuyue Zhong; Na Liu; Yue Chen
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.885

3.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Targeted Fluorescence Molecular Imaging for Postoperative Lymph Node Assessment in Patients with Oral Cancer.

Authors:  Jasper Vonk; Jaron G de Wit; Floris J Voskuil; Yang Hang Tang; Wouter T R Hooghiemstra; Matthijs D Linssen; Evert van den Broek; Jan J Doff; Sebastiaan A H J de Visscher; Kees-Pieter Schepman; Bert van der Vegt; Gooitzen M van Dam; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 11.082

4.  What NIR photodynamic activation offers molecular targeted nanomedicines: Perspectives into the conundrum of tumor specificity and selectivity.

Authors:  Chanda Bhandari; Mina Guirguis; N Anna Savan; Navadeep Shrivastava; Sabrina Oliveira; Tayyaba Hasan; Girgis Obaid
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 20.722

5.  The Potential of Nanobody-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy to Trigger Immune Responses.

Authors:  Irati Beltrán Hernández; Mathieu L Angelier; Tommaso Del Buono D'Ondes; Alessia Di Maggio; Yingxin Yu; Sabrina Oliveira
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  EGFR-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Luca Ulfo; Paolo Emidio Costantini; Matteo Di Giosia; Alberto Danielli; Matteo Calvaresi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  Nanobody-targeted photodynamic therapy induces significant tumor regression of trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer, after a single treatment session.

Authors:  Marion M Deken; Marta M Kijanka; Irati Beltrán Hernández; Maxime D Slooter; Henriette S de Bruijn; Paul J van Diest; Paul M P van Bergen En Henegouwen; Clemens W G M Lowik; Dominic J Robinson; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Sabrina Oliveira
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  HER2 targeting near-infrared photoimmunotherapy for a CDDP-resistant small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kazuomi Takahashi; Shunichi Taki; Hirotoshi Yasui; Yuko Nishinaga; Yoshitaka Isobe; Toshinori Matsui; Misae Shimizu; Chiaki Koike; Kazuhide Sato
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.