| Literature DB >> 29777389 |
Gabriela Wyszogrodzka1, Przemysław Dorożyński2, Barbara Gil3, Wieslaw J Roth3, Maciej Strzempek3, Bartosz Marszałek3, Władysław P Węglarz4, Elżbieta Menaszek5, Weronika Strzempek3, Piotr Kulinowski6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was initial evaluation of applicability of metal organic framework (MOF) Fe-MIL-101-NH2 as a theranostic carrier of antituberculous drug in terms of its functionality, i.e. drug loading, drug dissolution, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast and cytotoxic safety.Entities:
Keywords: MRI contrast agent; inhaled dosage forms; iron metal-organic framework (MOF); theranostic system; tuberculosis treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29777389 PMCID: PMC5960001 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2425-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Res ISSN: 0724-8741 Impact factor: 4.200
Fig. 1XRD patterns of Fe-MIL-101-NH: as synthesized, washed with ethanol, after introduction of isoniazid and again washed with ethanol after isoniazid introduction (from bottom to top)
Fig. 2SEM images of Fe-MIL-101-NH samples: (a) without treatment, (b) after milling (-M), (c) after milling and ultrasound treatment (-MU)
Fig. 3Drug loading: IR spectra in the N-H stretching vibration region (left) and framework vibrations (right) in transmission mode of: pure isoniazid (a), pure Fe-MIL-101-NH2 (b), physical mixture of Fe-MIL-101-NH2 with isoniazid (c), and isoniazid incorporated into Fe-MIL-101-NH2 (d). Arrows show the red-shift of some of the IR maxima
Fig. 4Isoniazid dissolution: Comparative in vitro dissolution (drug release) profile of INH from Fe-MIL-101-NH2 (blue) and crystalline INH (red)
Fig. 5Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Relaxometry and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: (a) The quantitative linear correlation between relaxation rates (R1, R2) and concentration of Fe-MIL-101-NH2 in a suspension. (b) MR images of FeMIL-101-NH2 showing the examples of positive (left image) and negative (right image) contrast due to differences in imaging sequence parameters (TR = 0.7 s, TE = 3.5 ms and TR = 3 s, TE = 21 ms respectively)
Fig. 6MOF cytotoxicity: (a) Dependence of fluorescence (in relative fluorescence units) on the concentration of Fe-MIL-101-NH2 contacted with L929 fibroblasts for 24 and 72 h. M – milled and MU – milled and ultrasonicated samples. C - control. (b) Photomicrographs of morphology of L929 fibroblasts after 24 h culture with addition of 0.625 mg/ml or 1.25 mg/ml of Fe-MIL-101-NH2 MOF. M – milled and MU – milled and ultrasonicated sample