Literature DB >> 29777168

The genetic basis of female pheromone differences between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Jessica A Pardy1, Howard D Rundle2, Mark A Bernards1, Amanda J Moehring3.   

Abstract

Chemical signals are one means by which many insect species communicate. Differences in the combination of surface chemicals called cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) can influence mating behavior and affect reproductive isolation between species. Genes influencing three CHC compounds have been identified in Drosophila melanogaster. However, the genetic basis of other CHC compounds, whether these genes affect species differences in CHCs, and the genes' resulting effect on interspecies mating, remains unknown. We used fine-scale deficiency mapping of the third chromosome to identify 43 genomic regions that influence production of CHCs in both D. melanogaster and Drosophila simulans females. We identified an additional 23 small genomic regions that affect interspecies divergence in CHCs between females of these two species, one of which spans two genes known to influence the production of multiple CHCs within D. melanogaster. By testing these genes individually, we determined that desat1 also affects interspecific divergence in one CHC compound, while desat2 has no effect on interspecific divergence. Thus, some but not all genes affecting intraspecific amounts of CHCs also affect interspecific divergence, but not all genes or all CHCs. Lastly, we find no evidence of a relationship between the CHC profile and female attractiveness or receptivity towards D. melanogaster males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29777168      PMCID: PMC6288273          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-018-0080-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  47 in total

1.  Cell biology. Fats, flies, and palmitate.

Authors:  Axel Nohturfft; Richard Losick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  J A Coyne; A P Crittenden; K Mah
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A gene responsible for a cuticular hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; C Wicker-Thomas; J M Jallon
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Role of Enhancer of zeste on the production of Drosophila melanogaster pheromonal hydrocarbons.

Authors:  C Wicker-Thomas; J Jallon
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2000-02

5.  Genetics of differences in pheromonal hydrocarbons between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  J A Coyne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Plant cuticular lipid export requires an ABC transporter.

Authors:  Jamie A Pighin; Huanquan Zheng; Laura J Balakshin; Ian P Goodman; Tamara L Western; Reinhard Jetter; Ljerka Kunst; A Lacey Samuels
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The genetics of mating recognition between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.

Authors:  Alberto Civetta; Elliott J F Cantor
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  A female-biased expressed elongase involved in long-chain hydrocarbon biosynthesis and courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Chertemps; Line Duportets; Carole Labeur; Ryu Ueda; Kuniaki Takahashi; Kaoru Saigo; Claude Wicker-Thomas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Physiological mechanisms of evolved desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Gibbs; A K Chippindale; M R Rose
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 10.  Wax, sex and the origin of species: Dual roles of insect cuticular hydrocarbons in adaptation and mating.

Authors:  Henry Chung; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.345

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Loci of Behavioral Evolution: Evidence That Fas2 and tilB Underlie Differences in Pupation Site Choice Behavior between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Michael P Shahandeh; Thomas L Turner
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  In situ lipid profiling of insect pheromone glands by direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Nicolas Cetraro; Joanne Y Yew
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.227

3.  The complex genetic architecture of male mate choice evolution between Drosophila species.

Authors:  Michael P Shahandeh; Thomas L Turner
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  The fruitless gene affects female receptivity and species isolation.

Authors:  Tabashir Chowdhury; Ryan M Calhoun; Katrina Bruch; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The Genetics of Male Pheromone Preference Difference Between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Michael P Shahandeh; Alison Pischedda; Jason M Rodriguez; Thomas L Turner
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Intraspecific Genetic Variation for Behavioral Isolation Loci in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jessica A Pardy; Samia Lahib; Mohamed A F Noor; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 7.  Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.

Authors:  Robert R H Anholt; Patrick O'Grady; Mariana F Wolfner; Susan T Harbison
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.