Literature DB >> 29777090

Reply to Eckles et al.: Facebook's optimization algorithms are highly unlikely to explain the effects of psychological targeting.

S C Matz1, M Kosinski2, G Nave3, D J Stillwell4.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29777090      PMCID： PMC6003367          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1806854115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Field studies of psychologically targeted ads face threats to internal validity.

Authors:  Dean Eckles; Brett R Gordon; Garrett A Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The large sample size fallacy.

Authors:  Björn Lantz
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2012-07-31

3.  Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion.

Authors:  S C Matz; M Kosinski; G Nave; D J Stillwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reply to Sharp et al.: Psychological targeting produces robust effects.

Authors:  S C Matz; M Kosinski; G Nave; D J Stillwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.