SUV ratios (SUVRs) are commonly used to quantify tracer uptake in amyloid-β PET. Here, we explore the impact of target and reference region-of-interest (ROI) selection on SUVR effect sizes using interventional data from the ongoing phase 1b PRIME study (NCT01677572) of aducanumab (BIIB037) in patients with prodromal or mild Alzheimer disease. Methods: The florbetapir PET SUVR was calculated at baseline (screening) and at weeks 26 and 54 for patients randomized to receive placebo and each of 4 aducanumab doses (1, 3, 6, and 10 mg/kg) using the whole cerebellum, cerebellar gray matter, cerebellar white matter, pons, and subcortical white matter as reference regions. In addition to the prespecified composite cortex target ROI, individual cerebral cortical ROIs were assessed as targets. Results: Of the reference regions used, subcortical white matter, cerebellar white matter, and the pons, alone or in combination, generated the largest effect sizes. The use of the anterior cingulate cortex as a target ROI resulted in larger effect sizes than the use of the composite cortex. SUVR calculations were not affected by correction for brain volume changes over time. Conclusion: Dose- and time-dependent reductions in the amyloid PET SUVR were consistently observed with aducanumab only in cortical regions prone to amyloid plaque deposition, regardless of the reference region used. These data support the hypothesis that florbetapir SUVR responses associated with aducanumab treatment are a result of specific dose- and time-dependent reductions in the amyloid burden in patients with Alzheimer disease.
RCT Entities:
SUV ratios (SUVRs) are commonly used to quantify tracer uptake in amyloid-β PET. Here, we explore the impact of target and reference region-of-interest (ROI) selection on SUVR effect sizes using interventional data from the ongoing phase 1b PRIME study (NCT01677572) of aducanumab (BIIB037) in patients with prodromal or mild Alzheimer disease. Methods: The florbetapir PET SUVR was calculated at baseline (screening) and at weeks 26 and 54 for patients randomized to receive placebo and each of 4 aducanumab doses (1, 3, 6, and 10 mg/kg) using the whole cerebellum, cerebellar gray matter, cerebellar white matter, pons, and subcortical white matter as reference regions. In addition to the prespecified composite cortex target ROI, individual cerebral cortical ROIs were assessed as targets. Results: Of the reference regions used, subcortical white matter, cerebellar white matter, and the pons, alone or in combination, generated the largest effect sizes. The use of the anterior cingulate cortex as a target ROI resulted in larger effect sizes than the use of the composite cortex. SUVR calculations were not affected by correction for brain volume changes over time. Conclusion: Dose- and time-dependent reductions in the amyloid PET SUVR were consistently observed with aducanumab only in cortical regions prone to amyloid plaque deposition, regardless of the reference region used. These data support the hypothesis that florbetapir SUVR responses associated with aducanumab treatment are a result of specific dose- and time-dependent reductions in the amyloid burden in patients with Alzheimer disease.
Authors: Cyrille Sur; Katarzyna Adamczuk; David Scott; James Kost; Mehul Sampat; Christopher Buckley; Gill Farrar; Ben Newton; Joyce Suhy; Idriss Bennacef; Michael F Egan Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Peter N E Young; Mar Estarellas; Emma Coomans; Meera Srikrishna; Helen Beaumont; Anne Maass; Ashwin V Venkataraman; Rikki Lissaman; Daniel Jiménez; Matthew J Betts; Eimear McGlinchey; David Berron; Antoinette O'Connor; Nick C Fox; Joana B Pereira; William Jagust; Stephen F Carter; Ross W Paterson; Michael Schöll Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Stephen Salloway; Lee A Honigberg; William Cho; Michael Ward; Michel Friesenhahn; Flavia Brunstein; Angelica Quartino; David Clayton; Deborah Mortensen; Tobias Bittner; Carole Ho; Christina Rabe; Stephen P Schauer; Kristin R Wildsmith; Reina N Fuji; Shehnaaz Suliman; Eric M Reiman; Kewei Chen; Robert Paul Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Isadora Lopes Alves; Fiona Heeman; Lyduine E Collij; Gemma Salvadó; Nelleke Tolboom; Natàlia Vilor-Tejedor; Pawel Markiewicz; Maqsood Yaqub; David Cash; Elizabeth C Mormino; Philip S Insel; Ronald Boellaard; Bart N M van Berckel; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Frederik Barkhof; Juan Domingo Gispert Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Haohui Liu; Ying-Hwey Nai; Francis Saridin; Tomotaka Tanaka; Jim O' Doherty; Saima Hilal; Bibek Gyanwali; Christopher P Chen; Edward G Robins; Anthonin Reilhac Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jordi Pegueroles; Victor Montal; Alexandre Bejanin; Eduard Vilaplana; Mateus Aranha; Miguel Angel Santos-Santos; Daniel Alcolea; Ignasi Carrió; Valle Camacho; Rafael Blesa; Alberto Lleó; Juan Fortea Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 21.566