Literature DB >> 29776982

Variable effectiveness of stepwise implementation of nudge-type interventions to improve provider compliance with intraoperative low tidal volume ventilation.

Vikas N O'Reilly-Shah1, George S Easton2, Craig S Jabaley1, Grant C Lynde1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identifying mechanisms to improve provider compliance with quality metrics is a common goal across medical disciplines. Nudge interventions are minimally invasive strategies that can influence behavioural changes and are increasingly used within healthcare settings. We hypothesised that nudge interventions may improve provider compliance with lung-protective ventilation (LPV) strategies during general anaesthesia.
METHODS: We developed an audit and feedback dashboard that included information on both provider-level and department-level compliance with LPV strategies in two academic hospitals, two non-academic hospitals and two academic surgery centres affiliated with a single healthcare system. Dashboards were emailed to providers four times over the course of the 9-month study. Additionally, the default setting on anaesthesia machines for tidal volume was decreased from 700 mL to 400 mL. Data on surgical cases performed between 1 September 2016 and 31 May 2017 were examined for compliance with LPV. The impact of the interventions was assessed via pairwise logistic regression analysis corrected for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: A total of 14 793 anaesthesia records were analysed. Absolute compliance rates increased from 59.3% to 87.8%preintervention to postintervention. Introduction of attending physician dashboards resulted in a 41% increase in the odds of compliance (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.69, p=0.002). Subsequently, the addition of advanced practice provider and resident dashboards lead to an additional 93% increase in the odds of compliance (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.46, p<0.001). Lastly, modifying ventilator defaults led to a 376% increase in the odds of compliance (OR 3.76, 95% CI 3.1 to 4.57, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Audit and feedback tools in conjunction with default changes improve provider compliance. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaesthesia; audit and feedback; implementation science; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29776982     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  5 in total

1.  Association of a multiple-step action with cervical lymph node yield of oral cancer patients in an Asian country.

Authors:  Ching-Chieh Yang; Bor-Hwang Kang; Wen-Shan Liu; Chun-Hao Yin; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 2.  Nudging healthcare professionals to improve treatment of COVID-19: a narrative review.

Authors:  Andreas Vilhelmsson; Anita Sant'Anna; Axel Wolf
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-12

Review 3.  Terminology, communication, and information systems in nonoperating room anaesthesia in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Christina A Jelly; Holly B Ende; Robert E Freundlich
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 4.  Nudging healthcare professionals in clinical settings: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Anita Sant'Anna; Andreas Vilhelmsson; Axel Wolf
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Systematic review of clinician-directed nudges in healthcare contexts.

Authors:  Briana S Last; Alison M Buttenheim; Carter E Timon; Nandita Mitra; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.