Literature DB >> 29776654

Defining and Measuring a Standard Set of Patient-Relevant Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease.

Edgar J Daeter1, Marijke J C Timmermans2, Alexander Hirsch3, Eric Lipsic4, Saskia Houterman5, Dennis van Veghel2, Paul B van der Nat6.   

Abstract

Systematic outcome measurement enables to continuously improve treatment results and stimulates dissemination of best practices. For patients with coronary artery disease, no examples yet exist of standard sets of patient-relevant outcome measures that have already been fully implemented at a large scale in clinical care. The aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to share the standard set of outcome measures as developed by Meetbaar Beter, and (2) to show how the standard set is presented and published to support improvement of cardiac care. A step-wise approach was followed by an expert panel to construct a standard set of outcome measures. This resulted in a comprehensive set of relevant outcome measures, comprising 4 generic and 11 treatment-specific outcomes. Both short-term and long-term outcomes measures up to 5 years of follow-up were included. Relevant initial conditions were selected to enable case-mix adjustment. The standard set has been implemented in 21 hospitals across the Netherlands. The results and experiences have been used to fine-tune the set in 4 reporting cycles in 2012 to 2016, using an annual maintenance cycle. Currently about 83,000 percutaneous coronary interventions and 30,000 coronary artery bypass graftings are included in the dataset, covering the majority of all percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graftings in the Netherlands. In conclusion, Meetbaar Beter has defined and implemented a comprehensive set of patient-relevant outcome measures for coronary artery disease, and the variation of the results among the centers indicates that there are sufficient opportunities to further improve cardiac care in the Netherlands.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29776654     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction among patients with coronary artery disease: an example of enhancing regional integration between a cardiac centre and a referring hospital.

Authors:  Dennis van Veghel; Mohamed Soliman-Hamad; Daniela N Schulz; Bernard Cost; Timothy A Simmers; Lukas R C Dekker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity.

Authors:  Christine Kersting; Malte Kneer; Anne Barzel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  First patient-centred set of outcomes for pulmonary sarcoidosis: a multicentre initiative.

Authors:  Nynke A Kampstra; Jan C Grutters; Frouke T van Beek; Daniel A Culver; Robert P Baughman; Elisabetta A Renzoni; Wim Wuyts; Vaslis Kouranos; Marlies S Wijsenbeek; Douwe H Biesma; Philip J van der Wees; Paul B van der Nat
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2019-02-18

4.  Results of the standard set for pulmonary sarcoidosis: feasibility and multicentre outcomes.

Authors:  Nynke A Kampstra; Paul B van der Nat; Lea M Dijksman; Frouke T van Beek; Daniel A Culver; Robert P Baughman; Elisabetta A Renzoni; Wim Wuyts; Vasilis Kouranos; Pieter Zanen; Marlies S Wijsenbeek; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Douwe H Biesma; Philip J van der Wees; Jan C Grutters
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2019-10-30

Review 5.  Using real-world data to monitor and improve quality of care in coronary artery disease: results from the Netherlands Heart Registration.

Authors:  Marijke J C Timmermans; Saskia Houterman; Edgar D Daeter; Peter W Danse; Wilson W Li; Erik Lipsic; Maaike M Roefs; Dennis van Veghel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Quality measurement for cardiovascular diseases and cancer in hospital value-based healthcare: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Rawia Abdalla; Milena Pavlova; Mohammed Hussein; Wim Groot
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Health Outcomes Management Evaluation-A National Analysis of Dutch Heart Care.

Authors:  Paul B van der Nat; Lineke Derks; Dennis van Veghel
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-05

8.  Outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients over 85 years of age versus patients aged 85 and younger.

Authors:  F S van den Brink; I Wijtsma; H Amrane; T N E Vossenberg; J Haenen; F Porta; A J Van Boven; S H Hofma
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.854

9.  Development of the First Patient-centred Set of Outcomes for Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Multicentre Initiative.

Authors:  Daan J Reesink; Ewoudt M W van de Garde; Diederik M Somford; Richard P Meijer; Maartje Los; Douwe H Biesma; Simon Horenblas; Harm H E van Melick; Paul B van der Nat
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-02-15

10.  Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands.

Authors:  G J van Steenbergen; B van Straten; K Y Lam; D van Veghel; L Dekker; P A Tonino
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.380

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.