Literature DB >> 29776471

Good functional outcomes expected after shoulder arthroplasty irrespective of body mass index.

David D Savin1, Rachel M Frank2, Shelby Sumner3, Catherine Richardson3, Gregory P Nicholson3, Anthony A Romeo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated how body mass index (BMI) factors into functional outcomes and complications after shoulder arthroplasty.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of age-matched patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), or hemiarthroplasty (HA). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, range of motion (ROM), and complications were assessed. Forty-nine patients were classified into the following groups: normal (BMI <24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2), class I obese (BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2), class II obese (BMI 35-39.9 kg/m2), and class III morbid obese (BMI ≥40 kg/m2).
RESULTS: A total of 245 patients (134 women, 111 men; average age, 64 ± 8 years) were evaluated at an average follow-up of 48 ± 18 months. TSA was performed in 122 patients (50%), RTSA was performed in 103 (42%), and HA was performed in 20 (8%). No significant difference was found among the 5 BMI groups in arthroplasty type (P = .108) or in complications, including reoperations (P = .27). All groups had significant postoperative improvements in PROs and ROM (P < .001 for both). There were no significant differences among the BMI groups in postoperative ROM or PROs. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that patients undergoing TSA, RTSA, and HA can expect good functional outcomes, with improvements in pain, function and outcome scores, irrespective of BMI.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Shoulder arthroplasty; body mass index; complications; obesity; outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29776471     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Body mass index as a risk factor for dislocation of total shoulder arthroplasty in the first 30 days.

Authors:  David J Kusin; Joshua A Ungar; Kaeli K Samson; Matthew J Teusink
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-09-11

2.  Patient-reported outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative risk factor analysis of improved versus unimproved cases.

Authors:  Moby Parsons; Howard D Routman; Christopher P Roche; Richard J Friedman
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-09-13

3.  Early outcomes and complications of obese patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashley Klein; Julio J Jauregui; Edward Raff; R Frank Henn; S Ashfaq Hasan; Mohit Gilotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-09-03

4.  Shoulder motion decreases as body mass increases in patients with asymptomatic shoulders.

Authors:  William E Allen; Jackie J Lin; William B Barfield; Richard J Friedman; Josef K Eichinger
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-27

5.  An analysis of body weight changes after shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Louis C Grandizio; Brian K Foster; Daniel J Torino; Elizabeth J Pavis; Idorenyin F Udoeyo
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-03-25

6.  Primary versus revision total shoulder arthroplasty: comparing relative value and reimbursement trends.

Authors:  John Joseph Carney; Erik Gerlach; Mark Plantz; Peter Raymond Swiatek; Jeremy Marx; Matthew Saltzman; Guido Marra
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2022-01-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.