Literature DB >> 29776469

Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores with legacy patient-reported outcome scores in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.

Brendan M Patterson1, Nathan D Orvets1, Alexander W Aleem1, Jay D Keener1, Ryan P Calfee1, Devon C Nixon1, Aaron M Chamberlain2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is being used to assess outcomes in many patient populations despite limited validation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores and PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Upper Extremity (UE) function scores collected preoperatively in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed 164 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Study inclusion required preoperative completion of the ASES and SST evaluations, as well as the PROMIS PF, UE, and Pain Interference computerized adaptive tests. Descriptive statistics were produced, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between each of the outcome measures.
RESULTS: Average PROMIS UE scores indicated greater impairment than PROMIS PF scores (34 vs 44). Three percent of patients reached the PROMIS UE ceiling score of 56. PROMIS PF scores demonstrated a weak correlation with ASES scores (r = 0.43, P < .001) and a moderate correlation with SST scores (r = 0.51, P < .001). PROMIS UE scores demonstrated a moderate correlation with both ASES scores (r = 0.59, P < .001) and SST scores (r = 0.62, P < .001). PROMIS Pain Interference scores demonstrated weak negative correlations with both ASES scores (r = -0.43, P < .001) and SST scores (r = -0.41, P < .001). Patients answered fewer questions on average using the PROMIS PF and UE instruments as compared with the ASES and SST instruments.
CONCLUSION: PROMIS UE scores indicate greater impairment and demonstrate a stronger correlation with the legacy shoulder scores than PROMIS PF scores in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears. PROMIS computerized adaptive tests allow for more efficient patient-reported outcome data collection compared with traditional outcome scores.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; PROMIS; Patient-reported outcomes; Simple Shoulder Test; computerized adaptive testing; psychometrics; rotator cuff tear; upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29776469     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

1.  PROMIS Versus Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Sports Medicine Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Knee, Shoulder, and Hip Interventions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Baron; Emily A Parker; Brian R Wolf; Kyle R Duchman; Robert W Westermann
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021-12

2.  Preoperative characteristics predictive of PROMIS Pain Interference two years after shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Matthew T Chrencik; Dominic J Ventimiglia; Matheus B Schneider; Tina Zhang; Kalin J Fisher; Alexander Hahn; Mohit N Gilotra; S Ashfaq Hasan; R Frank Henn
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-16

3.  The relationship between depression, anxiety, and pain interference with therapy referral and utilization among patients with hand conditions.

Authors:  Shannon K Cochrane; Ryan P Calfee; Macyn M Stonner; Ann Marie Dale
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 1.908

4.  Treatment Modality of Distal Ulnar Head and Neck Fractures Associated With Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures Does Not Affect Outcomes.

Authors:  Georgina Glogovac; Allison K Perry; Michael D Wigton; Peter J Stern
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-29

Review 5.  Use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Operative Shoulder Outcomes.

Authors:  Ilona Schwarz; John-Rudolph H Smith; Darby A Houck; Rachel M Frank; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-06-16

6.  Performance of the PROMIS After Operative Interventions for Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Christina J Hajewski; Natalie A Glass; Robert W Westermann; Matthew Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Carolyn Hettrich
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-24

7.  Preoperative Performance of PROMIS in Patients With Patellofemoral Malalignment and Chondral Disease.

Authors:  Christopher N Carender; Matthew J Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Kyle R Duchman; Qiang An; Robert W Westermann
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-07-10

8.  Is Social Deprivation Associated with PROMIS Outcomes After Upper Extremity Fractures in Children?

Authors:  Sophia Evans; Ugochi C Okoroafor; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Factors associated with pain intensity and magnitude of limitations among people with hip and knee arthritis.

Authors:  Benjamin Kopp; Kenneth Furlough; Tyler Goldberg; David Ring; Karl Koenig
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  Floor and Ceiling Effects, Time to Completion, and Question Burden of PROMIS CAT Domains Among Shoulder and Knee Patients Undergoing Nonoperative and Operative Treatment.

Authors:  Caleb M Gulledge; D Grace Smith; Alexander Ziedas; Stephanie J Muh; Vasilios Moutzouros; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2019-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.