Literature DB >> 29776248

US FDA and personalized medicine: in vitro diagnostic regulatory perspective.

Živana Težak1, Marina V Kondratovich2, Elizabeth Mansfield2.   

Abstract

Personalized medicine has captured the attention of the public, including patients, healthcare providers, scientists, medical product manufacturers and many others. The US FDA will evaluate many of the products that will allow personalized medicine to be successfully implemented in the USA. This article addresses the FDA's approach to regulation of one component of personalized medicine, in vitro diagnostic devices. It also describes the FDA's efforts to integrate the various medical product regulatory authorities provided by Congress in the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to develop effective mechanisms for oversight of medical products used to personalize treatment. Finally, it presents some of the current challenges in in vitro diagnostics oversight that may be of interest for personalized medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDA; companion diagnostics; device regulation; in vitro diagnostics; laboratory tests; personalized medicine; predictive markers; prognostic markers; regulatory challenges

Year:  2010        PMID: 29776248     DOI: 10.2217/pme.10.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Per Med        ISSN: 1741-0541            Impact factor:   2.512


  8 in total

Review 1.  Imaging biomarkers associated with cognitive decline: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan McConathy; Yvette I Sheline
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 2.  Lessons Learned: Transfer of the High-Definition Circulating Tumor Cell Assay Platform to Development as a Commercialized Clinical Assay Platform.

Authors:  P Kuhn; S M Keating; G T Baxter; K Thomas; A Kolatkar; C C Sigman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Personalized medicine could transform healthcare.

Authors:  Sunil Mathur; Joseph Sutton
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-06-02

Review 4.  Leveraging information from genetic risk scores of coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Themistocles L Assimes; Elias L Salfati; Liana C Del Gobbo
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.776

Review 5.  Clinically oriented Alzheimer's biosensors: expanding the horizons towards point-of-care diagnostics and beyond.

Authors:  Bayu Tri Murti; Athika Darumas Putri; Yi-June Huang; Shih-Min Wei; Chih-Wei Peng; Po-Kang Yang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 6.  Evolution of Chemosensitivity and Resistance Assays as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Bradley J Monk; Thomas J Herzog; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 7.  Prediction of resistance to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine L Lloyd; Ian A Cree; Richard S Savage
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Utilization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing in the United States: a case study of T3 translational research.

Authors:  Julie A Lynch; Muin J Khoury; Ann Borzecki; Jerry Cromwell; Laura L Hayman; Pat Reid Ponte; Glenn A Miller; Christopher S Lathan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.