Neil Sengupta1, Ariela L Marshall2, Blake A Jones3, Sandra Ham3, Elliot B Tapper4. 1. Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: nsengupta@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu. 2. Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about outcomes of patients hospitalized for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) while they are taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We aimed to determine the frequency at which patients resume DOAC therapy following hospitalization for GIB in a real-world setting, and the risks and benefits. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from the Truven Health Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2014. We collected data on 1338 adults treated with DOACs and hospitalized for GIB (dabigatran, n = 679; rivaroxaban, n = 608, apixaban, n = 51). Patients who developed GIB within 1 year of DOAC initiation, and had a DOAC claim filled within 1 month of GIB, were included in the analysis. Postdischarge readmissions due to thromboembolism and recurrent GIB within 90 days were reviewed. We used proportional hazards to identify factors associated with thromboembolism and recurrent GIB. RESULTS: The median age of patients who did not resume DOAC therapy was older (79 vs 78 y for patients who did resume DOAC therapy; P = .0005). Higher proportions of patients who did not resume DOAC had heart failure (25% vs 20% who did resume DOAC therapy; P = .01), received blood (36% vs 24%; P < .0001), and required intensive care (18% vs 12%; P = .003). Restarting DOAC therapy within 30 days was not associated with thromboembolism within 90 days (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.37-2.21) or recurrent GIB (HR, 1.44; 95% CI 0.72-2.68). On multivariate regression, prior venous thromboembolism was associated with postdischarge thromboembolism (HR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.29-7.38), and thienopyridine use was associated with recurrent GIB (HR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.55-5.81). A higher proportion of patients who resumed treatment with rivaroxaban, compared with other DOACs, had recurrence of GIB (log rank, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from adults treated with DOACs and hospitalized for GIB, we found that older patients who require blood and intensive care were less likely to restart treatment with DOACs after GIB. Resuming DOAC therapy was not associated with thromboembolism within 90 days or recurrence of GIB; a history of venous thromboembolism and thienopyridine use were associated with a risk of subsequent thromboembolism and GIB respectively.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about outcomes of patients hospitalized for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) while they are taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We aimed to determine the frequency at which patients resume DOAC therapy following hospitalization for GIB in a real-world setting, and the risks and benefits. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from the Truven Health Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2014. We collected data on 1338 adults treated with DOACs and hospitalized for GIB (dabigatran, n = 679; rivaroxaban, n = 608, apixaban, n = 51). Patients who developed GIB within 1 year of DOAC initiation, and had a DOAC claim filled within 1 month of GIB, were included in the analysis. Postdischarge readmissions due to thromboembolism and recurrent GIB within 90 days were reviewed. We used proportional hazards to identify factors associated with thromboembolism and recurrent GIB. RESULTS: The median age of patients who did not resume DOAC therapy was older (79 vs 78 y for patients who did resume DOAC therapy; P = .0005). Higher proportions of patients who did not resume DOAC had heart failure (25% vs 20% who did resume DOAC therapy; P = .01), received blood (36% vs 24%; P < .0001), and required intensive care (18% vs 12%; P = .003). Restarting DOAC therapy within 30 days was not associated with thromboembolism within 90 days (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.37-2.21) or recurrent GIB (HR, 1.44; 95% CI 0.72-2.68). On multivariate regression, prior venous thromboembolism was associated with postdischarge thromboembolism (HR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.29-7.38), and thienopyridine use was associated with recurrent GIB (HR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.55-5.81). A higher proportion of patients who resumed treatment with rivaroxaban, compared with other DOACs, had recurrence of GIB (log rank, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from adults treated with DOACs and hospitalized for GIB, we found that older patients who require blood and intensive care were less likely to restart treatment with DOACs after GIB. Resuming DOAC therapy was not associated with thromboembolism within 90 days or recurrence of GIB; a history of venous thromboembolism and thienopyridine use were associated with a risk of subsequent thromboembolism and GIB respectively.
Authors: Kylee L Martens; Simone E Dekker; Megan Crowe; Thomas G DeLoughery; Joseph J Shatzel Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 10.407
Authors: Eric Zhou; Aaron Lord; Amelia Boehme; Nils Henninger; Adam de Havenon; Farhaan Vahidy; Koto Ishida; Jose Torres; Eva A Mistry; Brian Mac Grory; Kevin N Sheth; M Edip Gurol; Karen Furie; Mitchell S V Elkind; Shadi Yaghi Journal: Stroke Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 7.914