Literature DB >> 29774864

Symptom-Based Ebola Risk Score for Ebola Virus Disease, Conakry, Guinea.

Brecht Ingelbeen, Anja De Weggheleire, Michel Van Herp, Johan van Griensven.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ebola; Ebola virus; Ebola virus disease; hemorrhagic fever; risk; viruses

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29774864      PMCID: PMC6004844          DOI: 10.3201/eid2406.171812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: In their article, Oza et al. proposed a score to risk-stratify Ebola virus disease (EVD) suspected cases while patients in an Ebola treatment center await laboratory confirmation (). The Ebola symptom-based risk (ESR) score, consisting of 6 symptoms (conjunctivitis, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, headache, difficulty breathing, loss of appetite), performed well in internal validation, but no external validation was done. We evaluated the proposed ESR score on 805 EVD-positive and 1,506 EVD-negative case-patients in the Conakry Ebola Treatment Center (ETC), Conakry, Guinea (). The ESR score yielded an area under the curve of 0.58 (95% CI 0.56–0.61), which is lower than the 0.83 (95% CI 0.79–0.86) Oza et al. reported (Technical Appendix Figure). Using the proposed risk thresholds (i.e., low risk if score <0, medium risk if score = 0, and high risk if score >0), 371 (46%) EVD-positive patients of the Conakry ETC were classified as high risk and 647 (43%) EVD-negative patients as low risk. However, negative and positive predictive values were generally low (Technical Appendix Table). Reasons for poor validation could include differences in applying the general EVD suspect case definition (integration of patients’ contact history); in patient characteristics because organization and access to care for EVD and non-EVD illness was different (patients in holding centers or ETC); in the quality of data collection (symptoms are entirely self-reported); and in underlying diseases of EVD-negative patients. Our findings underline the importance of external validation in various settings before risk scores are applied outside of the setting within which they were developed, as well as the need to incorporate patient contact history into predictive models. Point-of-care EVD diagnostic platforms can perform reliable confirmatory testing within 90 minutes (). We argue that, by integrating rapid confirmatory testing in triage, providers can avoid classifying patients by their likelihood of infection with Ebola virus while waiting for laboratory confirmation. Dr. Ingelbeen, a pharmacist and epidemiologist, worked during the 2014–2016 Ebola outbreak with Médecins sans Frontières in Guinea. He is a European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET) fellow at Santé publique France. His research interests include emerging and vectorborne infectious diseases.

Technical Appendix

Additional information about validation testing for Ebola symptom-based risk scores, Guinea.
  3 in total

1.  Mortality among PCR negative admitted Ebola suspects during the 2014/15 outbreak in Conakry, Guinea: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Brecht Ingelbeen; Elhadj Ibrahima Bah; Tom Decroo; Idrissa Balde; Helena Nordenstedt; Johan van Griensven; Anja De Weggheleire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Symptom- and Laboratory-Based Ebola Risk Scores to Differentiate Likely Ebola Infections.

Authors:  Shefali Oza; Alieu A Sesay; Neal J Russell; Kevin Wing; Sabah Boufkhed; Lahai Vandi; Sahr C Sebba; Rachael Cummings; Francesco Checchi
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.883

3.  Feasibility of Xpert Ebola Assay in Médecins Sans Frontières Ebola Program, Guinea.

Authors:  Rafael Van den Bergh; Pascale Chaillet; Mamadou Saliou Sow; Mathieu Amand; Charlotte van Vyve; Sylvie Jonckheere; Rosa Crestani; Armand Sprecher; Michel Van Herp; Arlene Chua; Erwan Piriou; Lamine Koivogui; Annick Antierens
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.883

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical and epidemiological performance of WHO Ebola case definitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Grazia Caleo; Foivi Theocharaki; Kamalini Lokuge; Helen A Weiss; Leena Inamdar; Francesco Grandesso; Kostas Danis; Biagio Pedalino; Gary Kobinger; Armand Sprecher; Jane Greig; Gian Luca Di Tanna
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 71.421

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.