Literature DB >> 29774595

Long-term Schneiderian membrane thickness changes following zygomatic implant placement: A retrospective radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography.

Kai Zhao1, Meifei Lian2, Shengchi Fan1, Wei Huang3, Feng Wang3, Yiqun Wu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term changes in the thickness of Schneiderian membranes after zygomatic implant placement using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients were included in this study. All the patients underwent bilateral zygomatic implant placement. Schneiderian membrane thickness (SMT) in 49 maxillary sinuses (one sinus was not included because of early loss of the zygomatic implants) was measured using CBCT before and at least 1 year after zygomatic implant placement. Ostium patency of each sinus was also evaluated and recorded.
RESULTS: In total, 84 zygomatic implants and 30 regular implants were placed in included patients. Two unilateral maxillary zygomatic implants in one patient were removed 2 months after implant placement. The SMT increased from 1.03 mm (inter-quartile range: 1.57 mm) to 1.33 mm (inter-quartile range: 1.98 mm) after a median follow-up time of 23.00 months (inter-quartile range: 14 months), and the difference was statistically significant. Before zygomatic implant insertion, 24.5% (12/49) of sinuses had SMT greater than 2 mm, whereas this value was 28.6% (14/49) after zygomatic implant placement. The percentage of sinuses observed with ostium patency also increased from 2.0% (1/49) to 12.2% (6/49).
CONCLUSIONS: Chronic Schneiderian membrane thickening could result from zygomatic implant insertion. Intensive postoperative care and clinical and radiographic monitoring are recommended after zygomatic implant placement.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Schneiderian membrane thickness; complications; maxillary sinus; radiographic analysis; zygomatic implants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29774595     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  3 in total

1.  Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 1-year follow-up non-interventional study.

Authors:  Carlos Aparicio; Waldemar D Polido; James Chow; Rubén Davó; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  Retrospective Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Data Regarding Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation with a Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Michele Di Cosola; Andrea Ballini; Khrystyna Zhurakivska; Alberto Ceccarello; Riccardo Nocini; Annarita Malcangi; Giorgio Mori; Lorenzo Lo Muzio; Stefania Cantore; Antonio Olivo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement.

Authors:  Yiqun Wu; Baoxin Tao; Kengliang Lan; Yihan Shen; Wei Huang; Feng Wang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.021

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.