Literature DB >> 29774322

Validity and Reliability of Turkish Male Breast Self-Examination Instrument.

Özüm Erkin1, İlknur Göl2.   

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to measure the validity and reliability of Turkish male breast self-examination (MBSE) instrument. Materials and
Methods: The methodological study was performed in 2016 at Ege University, Faculty of Nursing, İzmir, Turkey. The MBSE includes ten steps. For validity studies, face validity, content validity, and construct validity (exploratory factor analysis) were done. For reliability study, Kuder Richardson was calculated.
Results: The content validity index was found to be 0.94. Kendall W coefficient was 0.80 (p=0.551). The total variance explained by the two factors was found to be 63.24%. Kuder Richardson 21 was done for reliability study and found to be 0.97 for the instrument. The final instrument included 10 steps and two stages. Conclusions: The Turkish version of MBSE is a valid and reliable instrument for early diagnose. The MBSE can be used in Turkish speaking countries and cultures with two stages and 10 steps.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Male breast cancer; Turkish; male breast self-examination; reliability; validity

Year:  2018        PMID: 29774322      PMCID: PMC5939976          DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.3760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  15 in total

Review 1.  Translating instruments into other languages: development and testing processes.

Authors:  Ann Hilton; Myriam Skrutkowski
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 2.  Male breast cancer: risk factors, diagnosis, and management (Review).

Authors:  Katherine A Johansen Taber; Lee R Morisy; Albert J Osbahr; Barry D Dickinson
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.

Authors:  Denise F Polit; Cheryl Tatano Beck; Steven V Owen
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Decline in breast cancer incidence in the United States: what about male breast cancer?

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Christoph Thomssen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Outcome of non-metastatic male breast cancer: 118 patients.

Authors:  Ulkü Yalçıntaş Arslan; Berna Oksüzoğlu; Nuriye Ozdemir; Sercan Aksoy; Necati Alkış; Ayşe Gök; Mehmet Ali Kaplan; Mahmut Gümüş; Veli Berk; Doğan Uncu; Meltem Baykara; Dilşen Colak; Ummügül Uyetürk; Ibrahim Türker; Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Male breast cancer: a population-based comparison with female breast cancer.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Ismail Jatoi; Julia Tse; Philip S Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  'Marginalised malignancies': A qualitative synthesis of men's accounts of living with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kerry Quincey; Iain Williamson; Sue Winstanley
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Original Research: Men's awareness and knowledge of male breast cancer.

Authors:  Eileen Thomas
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.220

9.  Perspectives and Attitudes of Jordanian Male College Students on Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Khadeejeh Al Dasoqi; Ruqayya Zeilani; Hala Bawadi; Aysha Al Dasoqi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 10.  Male breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Ottini; Domenico Palli; Sergio Rizzo; Mario Federico; Viviana Bazan; Antonio Russo
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 6.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.