Gökhan Ertaş1, Can Onaygil2, Onur Buğdaycı3, Erkin Arıbal4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey. 2. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Oberlausitz-Kliniken gGmbH, Bautzen, Germany. 3. Department of Radiology, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Radiology, Acıbadem Altunizade Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of dual-phase apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) compared to traditional ADC values in quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating between benign and malignant breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted images of pathologically confirmed 88 benign and 85 malignant lesions acquired using a 3.0T MR scanner were analyzed. Small region-of-interests focusing on the highest signal intensity of lesions were used. Lesion ADC estimates were obtained separately from all b-value images (ADC; b=50, 400 and 800s/mm2), lower b-value images (ADClow; b=50 and 400s/mm2) and higher b-value images (ADChigh; b=400 and 800s/mm2). A set of dual-phase ADC (dpADC) models were constructed using ADClow, ADChigh and a perfusion influence factor ranging from 0 to 1. RESULTS: Strong positive correlation is observable between ADC and all dpADCs (ρ=0.80-1.00). Differences in ADC and dpADCs between the benign and the malignant lesions are all significant (p<0.05). In detecting malignancy, traditional lesion ADC provides a good performance (AUC=89.9%) however dpADC0.5 (dpADC with a factor of 0.5) accomplishes a better performance (AUC=90.8%). At optimal thresholds, ADC achieves 94.1% sensitivity, 72.7% specificity and 83.2% accuracy while dpADC0.5 leads to 92.9% sensitivity, 79.5% specificity and 86.1% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Dual-phase ADC modelling may improve the accuracy in breast cancer diagnosis using DWI. Further prospective studies are needed to justify its benefit in clinical setting.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of dual-phase apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) compared to traditional ADC values in quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating between benign and malignant breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted images of pathologically confirmed 88 benign and 85 malignant lesions acquired using a 3.0T MR scanner were analyzed. Small region-of-interests focusing on the highest signal intensity of lesions were used. Lesion ADC estimates were obtained separately from all b-value images (ADC; b=50, 400 and 800s/mm2), lower b-value images (ADClow; b=50 and 400s/mm2) and higher b-value images (ADChigh; b=400 and 800s/mm2). A set of dual-phase ADC (dpADC) models were constructed using ADClow, ADChigh and a perfusion influence factor ranging from 0 to 1. RESULTS: Strong positive correlation is observable between ADC and all dpADCs (ρ=0.80-1.00). Differences in ADC and dpADCs between the benign and the malignant lesions are all significant (p<0.05). In detecting malignancy, traditional lesion ADC provides a good performance (AUC=89.9%) however dpADC0.5 (dpADC with a factor of 0.5) accomplishes a better performance (AUC=90.8%). At optimal thresholds, ADC achieves 94.1% sensitivity, 72.7% specificity and 83.2% accuracy while dpADC0.5 leads to 92.9% sensitivity, 79.5% specificity and 86.1% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Dual-phase ADC modelling may improve the accuracy in breast cancer diagnosis using DWI. Further prospective studies are needed to justify its benefit in clinical setting.
Authors: M Costantini; P Belli; P Rinaldi; E Bufi; G Giardina; G Franceschini; G Petrone; L Bonomo Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Riham H Ei Khouli; Michael A Jacobs; Sarah D Mezban; Peng Huang; Ihab R Kamel; Katarzyna J Macura; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 11.105