Literature DB >> 29773662

Validation of the 16-Gene Recurrence Score in Patients with Locoregional, High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma from a Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Sunitinib.

Brian I Rini1, Bernard Escudier2, Jean-Francois Martini3, Ahmed Magheli4, Christer Svedman5, Margarita Lopatin5, Dejan Knezevic5, Audrey D Goddard5, Phillip G Febbo5, Rachel Li6, Xun Lin3, Olga Valota7, Michael Staehler8, Robert J Motzer9, Alain Ravaud10.   

Abstract

Purpose: Adjuvant sunitinib prolonged disease-free survival (DFS; HR, 0.76) in patients with locoregional high-risk renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the S-TRAC trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00375674). The 16-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay was previously developed and validated to estimate risk for disease recurrence in patients with RCC after nephrectomy. This analysis further validated the prognostic value of RS assay in patients from S-TRAC and explored the association of RS results with prediction of sunitinib benefit.Patients and
Methods: The analysis was prospectively designed with prespecified genes, algorithm, endpoints, and analytical methods. Primary RCC was available from 212 patients with informed consent; primary analysis focused on patients with T3 RCC. Gene expression was quantitated by RT-PCR. Time to recurrence (TTR), DFS, and renal cancer-specific survival (RCSS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and those without RS results, and between the sunitinib and placebo arms among patients with RS results. RS results predicted TTR, DFS, and RCSS in both arms, with the strongest results observed in the placebo arm. When high versus low RS groups were compared, HR for recurrence was 9.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.15-39.24; P < 0.001) in the placebo arm; interaction of RS results with treatment was not significant.Conclusions: The strong prognostic performance of the 16-gene RS assay was confirmed in S-TRAC, and the RS assay is now supported by level IB evidence. RS results may help identify patients at high risk for recurrence who may derive higher absolute benefit from adjuvant therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4407-15. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29773662     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  14 in total

1.  Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Sunitinib in Patients with High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma: Exploratory Pharmacogenomic Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel J George; Jean-Francois Martini; Michael Staehler; Robert J Motzer; Ahmed Magheli; Frede Donskov; Bernard Escudier; Sherry Li; Michelle Casey; Olga Valota; Brigitte Laguerre; Allan J Pantuck; Hardev S Pandha; Anup Patel; Maria Lechuga; Alain Ravaud
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Progress in Kidney Cancer Outcomes Through Collaboration, Innovation, and Discovery.

Authors:  David F McDermott; Michael Carducci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Angiogenic Factor and Cytokine Analysis among Patients Treated with Adjuvant VEGFR TKIs in Resected Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenxin Xu; Maneka Puligandla; Judith Manola; Andrea J Bullock; Daniel Tamasauskas; David F McDermott; Michael B Atkins; Naomi B Haas; Keith Flaherty; Robert G Uzzo; Janice P Dutcher; Robert S DiPaola; Rupal S Bhatt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  [Why have tyrosine kinase inhibitors failed in the adjuvant situation and do checkpoint inhibitors make more sense?]

Authors:  Susanne Krege
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Adjuvant Therapy Options in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Nieves Martinez Chanza; Abhishek Tripathi; Lauren C Harshman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-03

6.  Prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) based on a six-lncRNA-based risk score: an investigation based on RNA-sequencing data.

Authors:  Jiang-Hui Zeng; Wei Lu; Liang Liang; Gang Chen; Hui-Hua Lan; Xiu-Yun Liang; Xu Zhu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 7.  Modeling clear cell renal cell carcinoma and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Melissa M Wolf; W Kimryn Rathmell; Kathryn E Beckermann
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in an Arab Population.

Authors:  Ahmed Badran; Mahmoud A Elshenawy; Amgad Shahin; Ali Aljubran; Ahmed Alzahrani; Abdelmoneim Eldali; Shouki Bazarbashi
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-02

Review 9.  Prognostic Factors for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Their Application in Adjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Kalle E Mattila; Paula Vainio; Panu M Jaakkola
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Factor of Disease-free Survival in Postnephrectomy High-risk Locoregional Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of the S-TRAC Trial.

Authors:  Anup Patel; Alain Ravaud; Robert J Motzer; Allan J Pantuck; Michael Staehler; Bernard Escudier; Jean-François Martini; Mariajose Lechuga; Xun Lin; Daniel J George
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.