Lauren M Rossen1, Holly Hedegaard2, Diba Khan3, Margaret Warner4. 1. Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland. Electronic address: lrossen@cdc.gov. 2. Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland. 3. Division of Research Methodology, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland. 4. Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Understanding the geographic patterns of suicide can help inform targeted prevention efforts. Although state-level variation in age-adjusted suicide rates has been well documented, trends at the county-level have been largely unexplored. This study uses small area estimation to produce stable county-level estimates of suicide rates to examine geographic, temporal, and urban-rural patterns in suicide from 2005 to 2015. METHODS: Using National Vital Statistics Underlying Cause of Death Files (2005-2015), hierarchical Bayesian models were used to estimate suicide rates for 3,140 counties. Model-based suicide rate estimates were mapped to explore geographic and temporal patterns and examine urban-rural differences. Analyses were conducted in 2016-2017. RESULTS: Posterior predicted mean county-level suicide rates increased by >10% from 2005 to 2015 for 99% of counties in the U.S., with 87% of counties showing increases of >20%. Counties with the highest model-based suicide rates were consistently located across the western and northwestern U.S., with the exception of southern California and parts of Washington. Compared with more urban counties, more rural counties had the highest estimated suicide rates from 2005 to 2015, and also the largest increases over time. CONCLUSIONS: Mapping county-level suicide rates provides greater granularity in describing geographic patterns of suicide and contributes to a better understanding of changes in suicide rates over time. Findings may inform more targeted prevention efforts as well as future research on community-level risk and protective factors related to suicide mortality. Published by Elsevier Inc.
INTRODUCTION: Understanding the geographic patterns of suicide can help inform targeted prevention efforts. Although state-level variation in age-adjusted suicide rates has been well documented, trends at the county-level have been largely unexplored. This study uses small area estimation to produce stable county-level estimates of suicide rates to examine geographic, temporal, and urban-rural patterns in suicide from 2005 to 2015. METHODS: Using National Vital Statistics Underlying Cause of Death Files (2005-2015), hierarchical Bayesian models were used to estimate suicide rates for 3,140 counties. Model-based suicide rate estimates were mapped to explore geographic and temporal patterns and examine urban-rural differences. Analyses were conducted in 2016-2017. RESULTS: Posterior predicted mean county-level suicide rates increased by >10% from 2005 to 2015 for 99% of counties in the U.S., with 87% of counties showing increases of >20%. Counties with the highest model-based suicide rates were consistently located across the western and northwestern U.S., with the exception of southern California and parts of Washington. Compared with more urban counties, more rural counties had the highest estimated suicide rates from 2005 to 2015, and also the largest increases over time. CONCLUSIONS: Mapping county-level suicide rates provides greater granularity in describing geographic patterns of suicide and contributes to a better understanding of changes in suicide rates over time. Findings may inform more targeted prevention efforts as well as future research on community-level risk and protective factors related to suicide mortality. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Cynthia A Claassen; Paul S Yip; Paul Corcoran; Robert M Bossarte; Bruce A Lawrence; Glenn W Currier Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2010-06
Authors: William C Kerr; Mark S Kaplan; Nathalie Huguet; Raul Caetano; Norman Giesbrecht; Bentson H McFarland Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Arthur G Cosby; M Maya McDoom-Echebiri; Wesley James; Hasna Khandekar; Willie Brown; Heather L Hanna Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Morhaf Al Achkar; Ian M Bennett; Lydia Chwastiak; Theresa Hoeft; Tre Normoyle; Melinda Vredevoogd; Davis G Patterson Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Rie Sakai-Bizmark; Hiraku Kumamaru; Dennys Estevez; Emily H Marr; Edith Haghnazarian; Lauren E M Bedel; Laurie A Mena; Mark S Kaplan Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Pam Baker DeGuzman; David L Vogel; Bethany Horton; Veronica Bernacchi; C Allen Cupp; B J Ferrebee Ghamandi; Ivora D Hinton; Christi Sheffield; Mark J Jameson Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 4.062