Literature DB >> 29773278

Medial Tibial Periprosthetic Bone Resorption and Its Effect on Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Cobalt-Chromium vs Titanium Implants.

Chan Yoon1, Moon Jong Chang1, Chong Bum Chang1, Min Kyu Song1, Jae Hoon Shin1, Seung-Baik Kang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, concerns arose over the medial tibial bone resorption of a novel cobalt-chromium implant. This study aimed at investigating the effects of tibial component material, design, and patient factors on periprosthetic bone resorption and at determining its association with clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: A total of 462 primary TKAs using 5 types of implants were included. To evaluate tibial periprosthetic bone resorption, we assessed radiolucent lines and change in bone mineral density at the medial tibial condyle (BMDMT). Factors related to bone resorption were assessed using regression analysis. Clinical outcomes were also evaluated with respect to periprosthetic bone resorption.
RESULTS: Compared to titanium implants, cobalt-chromium implants showed a higher incidence of complete radiolucent lines (23.1% vs 7.9% at 2 years post-TKA) and a greater degree of BMDMT reduction. However, there was no significant difference between the implants made of the same material. Increased medial tibial bone resorption was associated with male sex, osteoporosis, larger preoperative varus deformity, longer follow-up period, and lower body mass index. The periprosthetic bone resorption was not associated with clinical outcomes including changes in range of motion and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. Furthermore, no cases warranted additional surgery.
CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic bone resorption was associated with implant material but not with implant design. Moreover, patient factors were related to the medial tibial bone resorption post-TKA. However, the periprosthetic bone resorption was not associated with short-term clinical outcomes. We contend that researchers should incorporate integrative considerations when developing and assessing novel implants.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; implant design; implant material; periprosthetic bone resorption; radiolucent line; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29773278     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Stress shielding in total knee replacements: Comparative analysis between titanium and all-polyethylene bases at 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Germán Garabano; Joaquín Rodriguez; Leonel Perez Alamino; Cesar Angel Pesciallo; Hernán Del Sel; Fernando Lopreite
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-16

2.  Tibial component coverage affects tibial bone resorption and patient-reported outcome measures for patients following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Changquan Liu; Guanglei Zhao; Kangming Chen; Jinyang Lyu; Jie Chen; Jingsheng Shi; Gangyong Huang; Feiyan Chen; Yibing Wei; Siqun Wang; Jun Xia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effects of implant materials and designs on periprosthetic tibial bone resorption.

Authors:  Hyung Jun Park; Tae Soo Bae; Seung-Baik Kang; Hyeong Ho Baek; Moon Jong Chang; Chong Bum Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Total and partial knee arthroplasty implants that maintain native load transfer in the tibia.

Authors:  Maxwell J Munford; Jennifer C Stoddart; Alexander D Liddle; Justin P Cobb; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Biomechanical effect of anatomical tibial component design on load distribution of medial proximal tibial bone in total knee arthroplasty : finite element analysis indicating anatomical design prevents stress-shielding.

Authors:  Byung W Cho; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hyuck M Kwon; Woo-Suk Lee; Ick H Yang; Ji H Nam; Yong-Gon Koh; Kwan K Park
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.410

Review 6.  From the Performance to the Essence: The Biological Mechanisms of How Tantalum Contributes to Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Hu Qian; Ting Lei; Zhimin Ye; Yihe Hu; Pengfei Lei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.