| Literature DB >> 29773076 |
Richard K M'Bra1,2,3,4, Brama Kone5,6, Yapi G Yapi7, Kigbafori D Silué5,8, Ibrahima Sy9, Danielle Vienneau10,11, Nagnin Soro12, Guéladio Cissé10,11, Jürg Utzinger10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is a water-based disease transmitted by trematodes belonging to the genus Schistosoma. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the prevalence of schistosomiasis and access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and environmental and socioeconomic factors in the city of Korhogo, northern Côte d'Ivoire.Entities:
Keywords: Côte d’Ivoire; Schistosomiasis; School-aged children; Urban agriculture; Vulnerability index; Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29773076 PMCID: PMC5958400 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-018-0431-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
Fig. 1Geographical distribution and type of drinking water sources in the households of Korhogo, stratified by neighbourhood (March 2015)
Fig. 2Geographical distribution and type of latrines used in the households of Korhogo, stratified by neighbourhood (March 2015)
Fig. 3Number of human-water contact sites and main activities at these sites in Korhogo, stratified by neighbourhood (March 2015)
Fig. 4Principal component analysis of variables related to environmental vulnerability in the city of Korhogo (March 2015) in the F1-F2 plane. The x- and y-coordinates of a variable are given by its correlations with the first (F1) and second factor (F2), respectively
Fig. 5Mean values of the first (x-coordinate) and second (y-coordinate) principal component score by neighbourhood. The mean value of the first score expresses environmental vulnerability of the respective neighbourhood (low values indicate higher vulnerability). Red lines indicate boundaries between consecutive categories of environmental vulnerability (defined by the k-means procedure)
Fig. 6Spatial distribution of households with schistosomiasis cases in Korhogo (March 2015)
Knowledge about schistosomiasis in the study population in Korhogo (March 2015)
| Variables | Yes | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of the diseases | ||
| blood in urine or stool | 129 (17.8) | 724 (100) |
| Is schistosomiasis transmitted by | ||
| • Drinking unsafe water | 209 (31.2) | 671 (100) |
| • Eating contaminated food | 13 (1.9) | |
| • Washing in surface water | 474 (70.6) | |
| • By contamination | 42 (6.3) | |
| • Walking without shoes in urine | ||
| of infected person | 42 (6.3) | |
| • Contact with waste water | 358 (53.3) | |
| • Others | 53 (7.9) | |
| Do you know the symptoms? | 73 (71.6) | 102 (100) |
| Is schistosomiasis manifested by? | ||
| • Painful urination | 16 (21.9) | 73 (100) |
| • Urine scanty and frequent | 7 (9.6) | |
| • Blood in stool | 40 (54.8) | |
| • Intestinal disorders | 1 (1.4) | |
| • Headache | 3 (4.1) | |
| • Blood in urine | 50 (68.5) | |
| • Others | 13 (17.8) | |
Sociodemographic characteristics and their association with schistosomiasis in Korhogo in (March 2015)
| Characteristics | Infected | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Males ( | 36 (7.0) | < 0.001 |
| Females ( | 5 (0.9) | |
| Age (in years) | ||
| [5–10] ( | 8 (1.5) | < 0.001 |
| [10–15] ( | 33 (5.8) | |
| Education level of houshold head or spouse | ||
| No education ( | 15 (5.4) | 0.17 |
| Primary ( | 20 (3.0) | |
| Secondary ( | 6 (4.0) | |
| Professional activities of household’s head | ||
| No activity( | 8 (3.3) | 0.832 |
| Agriculture ( | 1 (1.8) | |
| Seller ( | 23 (4.3) | |
| Official ( | 9 (3.3) | |
| Knowledge of the diseases | ||
| Blood in urine and stool ( | 11 (5.2) | 0.224 |
| Knowledge on transmission | ||
| Drinking unsafe water ( | 2 (4.6) | 1.00 |
| Washing in surface water ( | 8 (7.2) | 0.45 |
| Contact with waste water ( | 6 (6.9) | 0.73 |
Environmental characteristics and their association with S. mansoni in Korhogo (March 2015)
| Characteristics | Infected | |
|---|---|---|
| Source of drinking water | ||
| Tap water( | 21 (5.4) | 0.045 |
| Well water( | 17 (2.5) | 0.008 |
| Pump ( | 3 (4.9) | 0.493 |
| Source of water for laundry | ||
| Tap water ( | 10 (4.7) | 0.422 |
| Well water ( | 30 (3.4) | 0.321 |
| Surface water ( | 0 (0.0) | 1.000 |
| Pump ( | 2 (4.4) | 0.680 |
| Source of water for washing dishes | ||
| Tap water ( | 11 (4.6) | 0.442 |
| Well water ( | 27 (3.2) | 0.090 |
| Surface water ( | 0 (0.0) | 1.000 |
| Pump ( | 2 (4.1) | 0.703 |
| Source of water for garden | ||
| Tap water ( | 2 (5.1) | 0.650 |
| Well water ( | 8 (6.1) | 0.140 |
| Surface water ( | 0 (0.0) | 1.000 |
| Pump ( | 0 (0.0) | 1.000 |
| Type of latrine | ||
| Modern latrine ( | 9 (3.5) | 0.850 |
| Traditional latrine ( | 34 (3.6) | 0.331 |
| No latrine ( | 2 (3.8) | |
| Drainage of waste water | ||
| Septic tank ( | 7 (4.8) | 0.164 |
| In the nature ( | 34 (3.6) | |
| Drainage of solid waste | ||
| Garbage dump ( | 13 (4.1) | 0.026 |
| In the nature ( | 28 (3.6) | |
| House construction material | ||
| Wood house ( | 4 (2.7) | 0.936 |
| Brick home ( | 37 (3.9) | |
| House light source | ||
| Electricity ( | 35 (4.2) | 0.103 |
| Artisanal source ( | 6 (2.3) | |
| Existence of surface water | ||
| Point at 500 m from house | ||
| Yes ( | 25 (6.4) | 0.001 |
| No ( | 16 (2.3) | |
Univariable and multiple logistic regression analysis of variables associated with S. mansoni among study participants non-adjusted and adjusted for age and sex and for socioeconomic status of household head in Korhogo
| Schistosomiasis | a | |
|---|---|---|
| Sociodemographic factors | ||
| Age (in year) ([10–15]/[5–10]) | 6.26 (2.30–17.20) | 6.05 (2.32–15.80)* |
| Sex (females / males) | 0.08 (0.03–0.25) | 0.08 (0.03–0.26)* |
| School level of the childrena | ||
| Schooled/non–schooled | 0.63 (0.28–1.38) | 0.40 (0.16–0.99) |
| School level of parentsb | ||
| High/low | 1.14 (0.46–2.85) | 1.37 (0.51–3.68) |
| Environmental factors (no vs. yes) | ||
| Well as source of drinking water | 2.79 (1.20–6.51) | 2.93 (1.09–7.92)* |
| Well as source of plant watering | 0.54 (0.18–1.60) | 0.40 (0.11–1.48) |
| Tap as source of drinking water | 0.47 (0.20–1.08) | 0.45 (0.17–1.21) |
| Using modern latrine | 1.16 (0.42–3.17) | 1.27 (0.42–3.86) |
| Household at 500 m from surface water | 0.29 (0.13–0.70) | 0.31 (0.12–0.82)* |
| Swimming in surface water point | 0.16 (0.04–0.56) | 0.12 (0.02–0.66)* |
| Fishing in surface water | 0.30 (0.07–1.31) | 0.23 (0.01–7.93) |
| Socio–economic status (by PCA)c | ||
| Most poor | ||
| Poor | 4.75 (1.20–18.88) | |
| Less poor | 2.45 (0.70–8.58) | |
*P < 0.05, P-value obtained from mixed logistic regression model with S. mansoni infection as outcome and household as clustering factor
aSchooled = Children educated in the classical system: primary and secondary school; Non-schooled = Children non-educated in the classical system: who never went to school + Koranic school
bHigh = Parents with university and secondary schools level; Low = parents with primary and Koranic school level or who never went to school
cPrincipal component analysis (PCA) based on the possession of: television, radio, fridge, bicycle, motorbike, car, electricity, ventilator, tap water, latrine, brick home