Literature DB >> 2977289

High-resolution separation and accurate size determination in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA. 4. Influence of DNA topology.

M K Mathew1, C F Hui, C L Smith, C R Cantor.   

Abstract

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is a powerful technique for the fractionation of linear DNA molecules with sizes above 50 kilobase pairs (kb). Here it is demonstrated that this technique is also effective for separating smaller DNAs including linear, circular, and supercoiled species. The mobilities of linear DNAs larger than 8 kb can be modulated by pulse times between 0.1 and 100 s. The mobility of supercoiled DNA molecules up to 16 kb is generally unaffected by these pulse times except that 10-s pulse times cause a small but distinct increase in the mobility. The general insensitivity of small supercoiled DNAs to pulse time presumably occurs because these species reorient so rapidly that they spend most of their time undergoing conventional electrophoresis. However, the mobilities of larger supercoiled DNAs are affected by pulse times of less than 1 s, and at 0.1 s the molecules are better resolved by pulsed electrophoresis than by ordinary electrophoresis. The mobility of 3-19 kb nicked and relaxed circular DNA molecules is also affected by pulse time but in a complex way.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2977289     DOI: 10.1021/bi00426a022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  12 in total

1.  The effect of DNA concentration on mobility in pulsed field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  N A Doggett; C L Smith; C R Cantor
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Comparison of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, Ribotyping, and Plasmid Profiling for Typing of Vibrio anguillarum Serovar O1.

Authors:  M N Skov; K Pedersen; J L Larsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The impact of two-dimensional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis techniques for the consistent and complete mapping of bacterial genomes: refined physical map of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO.

Authors:  U Römling; B Tümmler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-06-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  New approaches for physical mapping of small genomes.

Authors:  C L Smith; G Condemine
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Pulse time and agarose concentration affect the electrophoretic mobility of cccDNA during PFGE and FIGE [corrected].

Authors:  B W Sobral; A G Atherly
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping for subtyping of Vibrio cholerae O139 isolated in Thailand.

Authors:  A Dalsgaard; M N Skov; O Serichantalergs; P Echeverria
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.451

7.  Molecular evolution of Vibrio cholerae O1 strains isolated in Lima, Peru, from 1991 to 1995.

Authors:  A Dalsgaard; M N Skov; O Serichantalergs; P Echeverria; R Meza; D N Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Electrophoretic separation of the three Rhizobium meliloti replicons.

Authors:  B W Sobral; R J Honeycutt; A G Atherly; M McClelland
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Genome organization and localization of the pufLM genes of the photosynthesis reaction center in phylogenetically diverse marine Alphaproteobacteria.

Authors:  Silke Pradella; Martin Allgaier; Christa Hoch; Orsola Päuker; Erko Stackebrandt; Irene Wagner-Döbler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Genomes of surface isolates of Alteromonas macleodii: the life of a widespread marine opportunistic copiotroph.

Authors:  Mario López-Pérez; Aitor Gonzaga; Ana-Belen Martin-Cuadrado; Olga Onyshchenko; Akbar Ghavidel; Rohit Ghai; Francisco Rodriguez-Valera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.