| Literature DB >> 29772663 |
Shuo Yang1,2, Dirk Oliver Schmidt3,4, Abhishek Khetan5, Felix Schrader6,7, Simon Jakobi8,9, Melanie Homberger10,11, Michael Noyong12,13, Anja Paulus14,15, Hans Kungl16,17, Rüdiger-Albert Eichel18,19,20, Heinz Pitsch21, Ulrich Simon22,23.
Abstract
LiNi0.5Mn1.5O₄ (LNMO) spinel has been extensively investigated as one of the most promising high-voltage cathode candidates for lithium-ion batteries. The electrochemical performance of LNMO, especially its rate performance, seems to be governed by its crystallographic structure, which is strongly influenced by the preparation methods. Conventionally, LNMO materials are prepared via solid-state reactions, which typically lead to microscaled particles with only limited control over the particle size and morphology. In this work, we prepared Ni-doped LiMn₂O₄ (LMO) spinel via the polyol method. The cycling stability and rate capability of the synthesized material are found to be comparable to the ones reported in literature. Furthermore, its electronic charge transport properties were investigated by local electrical transport measurements on individual particles by means of a nanorobotics setup in a scanning electron microscope, as well as by performing DFT calculations. We found that the scarcity of Mn3+ in the LNMO leads to a significant decrease in electronic conductivity as compared to undoped LMO, which had no obvious effect on the rate capability of the two materials. Our results suggest that the rate capability of LNMO and LMO materials is not limited by the electronic conductivity of the fully lithiated materials.Entities:
Keywords: DFT calculations; LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 spinel; Lithium-ion battery; electrical conductivity; rate capability
Year: 2018 PMID: 29772663 PMCID: PMC5978183 DOI: 10.3390/ma11050806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Powder XRD pattern of LNMO prepared via polyol-mediated synthesis.
Figure 2SEM micrographs of as-prepared LNMO: (b,c) the particle morphologies of the octahedral particles and the particles with irregular shape, respectively, with higher magnification than (a).
Figure 3SEM micrograph (a); and EDX line scan in the same region with Mn in red and Ni in turquoise (b) of as-prepared LNMO.
Figure 4SAED pattern of as-prepared LNMO: (a) TEM micrograph of individual LNMO particle; and (b) inverted SAED pattern measured in the region of the red-circled area in (a).
Stoichiometry of individual LNMO particles based on EDX measurements in TEM.
| Particle | Mn Content (At %) | Ni Content (At %) | Stoichiometry |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81 | 19 | LiNi0.38Mn1.62O4 |
| 2 | 80 | 20 | LiNi0.40Mn1.60O4 |
Figure 5First principles calculated polaron hopping barriers for LMO (peach) and LiNi0.375Mn1.625O4 (teal). The system energy values are normalized and mentioned per supercell. Reaction Coordinate 0 is the initial and 8 is the final stable state for each of the cases.
Figure 6Geometric structures of the initial (a) and final (b) stable states for LMO polaron hopping. The selected Mn and O atoms, and Mn-O bonds (matte finish) depict the elongated bonds, in this case along the a-axis. The Mn atom marked 0 is the atom centered at the JT distortion in the initial state, which hops to the Mn atom marked 8 in the final stable state. Li (green), Mn (purple), O (red).
Figure 7Geometric structures of the initial (a) and final (b) stable states for LiNi0.375Mn1.625O4 polaron hopping. The selected Mn and O atoms, and Mn-O bonds (matte finish) depict the elongated bonds, in this case along all axes. The Mn atom marked 0 is the atom centered at the JT distortion in the initial state, which then hops to and is shared with the Mn atom marked 8 in the final stable state. Li (green), Ni (silver), Mn (purple), O (red).
Figure 8Cyclic voltammogram of as-prepared LNMO.
Figure 9Discharge curves of the as-prepared LNMO with a constant current of C/20.
Figure 10Cycling stability of the as-prepared LNMO.
Figure 11Rate capability of as-prepared LMO and LNMO.