| Literature DB >> 29772030 |
Juan H Hernandez-Medrano, Katrina J Copping, Andrew Hoare, Wendela Wapanaar, Rosalie Grivell, Tim Kuchel, Giuliana Miguel-Pacheco, I Caroline McMillen, Raymond J Rodgers, Viv E A Perry.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125694.].Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29772030 PMCID: PMC5957410 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197942
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 2Median Uterine Artery diameter according to PERI and PREconception diet.
Mean (±SEM) Median Uterine Artery (MUA) diameter (mm) in heifers carrying male (M) and female (F) fetuses according to A) PERIconception diet Low (7%CP; M n = 20 and F n = 8) and High protein (14%CP; M n = 25 and F n = 11) from 60d prior to conception to 23dpc in Experiment 1 and B) PREconception diet Low (10%CP; M n = 13 and F n = 3) and High protein (18%CP; m n = 7 and F n = 11) from -60d to conception in Experiment 2.; ** denotes P≤0.01.
Fig 3Pulsatility Index according to PERIconception diet.
Pulsatility Index (mean ±SEM) by PERIconception diet (■ Low 7%CP and ● High 14%CP) from 60d prior to conception to 23dpc in Experiment 1 in male (Low n = 20 and High n = 25) and female fetuses (Low n = 8 and High n = 11). * denotes P≤0.05.
Fig 8Post-mortem fetal heart weight according to POSTimplantation diet.
Mean (±SEM) post-mortem fetal heart weight (g) in male (M) and female (F) 98-day-old fetuses from heifers fed Low (7% CP, M n = 9 and F n = 10) or High (14% CP, M n = 16 and F n = 11) POSTimplantation diet from 23 to 98 days post conception.