| Literature DB >> 29771993 |
Valentina Zaffaroni Caorsi, Camila Both, Sonia Cechin, Rógger Antunes, Márcio Borges-Martins.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183342.].Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29771993 PMCID: PMC5957339 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Calling activity of (A) .
Fig 4Effects of traffic noise on call parameters of the two hylids.
Graphs show call parameter means (±SE) at the four periods of time inside a playback, P1 (pre–stimuli, silence), N1 (noise1), N2 (noise2), P2 (post–stimuli, silence). Dashed line represents the playback order N1 (75dB) followed by N2 (65dB) and solid line the other way around N1 (65dB) and N2 (75dB). During road noise treatments, Boana bischoffi decreased call rate (A). Peak frequency was significantly different for B. bischoffi, decreasing from period P1 to P2 (C). Call duration showed changes in B. leptolineata depending on the order of the treatment (E). Letters “a” and “–b” indicate statistically different values due to treatments (intensity) or playback periods, and “*” indicate differences due to playback type/order (65 or 75dB first).