| Literature DB >> 29771979 |
Xuyang Wang1,2, Yuqiang Li1,3, Yinping Chen4, Jie Lian1,3, Yongqing Luo1,3, Yayi Niu1,2, Xiangwen Gong1,2.
Abstract
The spatial pattern of soil organic class="Chemical">carbon (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29771979 PMCID: PMC5957344 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Location of the study area and sampling sites.
Reprinted from [ (a) Naiman Banner is located in the southern part of the Horqin Sandy Land (HSL). The northern and central areas of Naiman Banner belong to the national ecological function protected area (EFPA); the southern part belongs to the Source Region of the West Liaohe River (WLR). (b) The research area is located in the southeastern part of Inner Mongolia, in northern China. The region has been divided into three zones (AP, alluvial plains; SL, sandy land; LH, low hills) based on the soil and land use characteristics and Landsat ETM+ imagery from (c) June 2010 and (d) July 2015.
Fig 2Land use pattern in Naiman Banner in 2015.
Reprinted from [ Three types of grassland were defined: H, M, and L, which represent high (> 50%), medium (> 20–50%), and low (> 5–20%) vegetation cover, respectively. The dataset was provided by the Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://www.resdc.cn).
Fig 3The distribution of soil types in Naiman banner.
Reprinted from [ There are six soil types in Naiman Banner according to the second national soil survey: Arenosols cover 58.2% of the total area, Cambisols cover 20.0%, Argosols cover 12.1%, Kastanozems cover 8.4%, Gleysols cover 1.2%, and Solonchaks cover 0.1%.
Statistical characteristics of the soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) densities (kg m-2 to a depth of 100 cm) in Naiman Banner of northeastern China (n = 332 sample sites).
| Category | n | Parameter | Mean | Min | Max | S.E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC | 4.85 | 0.37 | 13.74 | 0.18 | ||
| TN | 1.63 | 0.03 | 1.63 | 0.02 | ||
| SOC | 5.12 | 1.11 | 13.48 | 0.29 | ||
| TN | 0.57 | 0.09 | 1.35 | 0.03 | ||
| C/N | 9.02 | 6.34 | 13.76 | 0.13 | ||
| SOC | 3.54 | 0.60 | 8.14 | 0.17 | ||
| TN | 0.38 | 0.03 | 0.86 | 0.02 | ||
| C/N | 9.61 | 4.92 | 17.48 | 0.26 | ||
| SOC | 3.93 | 1.58 | 10.17 | 0.41 | ||
| TN | 0.42 | 0.15 | 1.03 | 0.04 | ||
| C/N | 9.41 | 7.01 | 12.69 | 0.26 | ||
| SOC | 5.04 | 1.11 | 12.40 | 0.50 | ||
| TN | 0.53 | 0.12 | 1.35 | 0.05 | ||
| C/N | 9.41 | 7.81 | 12.69 | 0.14 | ||
| SOC | 3.20 | 0.37 | 13.12 | 0.22 | ||
| TN | 0.35 | 0.03 | 1.30 | 0.02 | ||
| C/N | 9.17 | 4.73 | 17.48 | 0.17 | ||
| SOC | 3.92 | 2.44 | 8.14 | 0.24 | ||
| TN | 0.46 | 0.29 | 0.81 | 0.02 | ||
| C/N | 8.47 | 6.34 | 11.97 | 0.26 | ||
| SOC | 7.85 | 1.09 | 13.74 | 0.41 | ||
| TN | 0.89 | 0.12 | 1.63 | 0.05 | ||
| C/N | 8.88 | 5.01 | 12.51 | 0.13 | ||
| SOC | 4.41 | 1.18 | 11.49 | 0.23 | ||
| TN | 0.49 | 0.08 | 1.30 | 0.02 | ||
| C/N | 9.10 | 4.92 | 15.09 | 0.20 |
Fig 4Differences in the soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) densities to a depth of 100 cm among the five soil types.
For a given element, bars labeled with different letters differ significantly (one-way ANOVA followed by LSD test, P < 0.01). Values are means ± SE.
Fig 5Differences in the soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) densities to a depth of 100 cm for all sites combined in Naiman Banner and for the three land use types.
For a given parameter, bars labeled with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by LSD test). Values are means ± SE.
Fig 6Regression equations for the relationship between (A, B, C) the soil organic carbon (SOC) content and the total nitrogen (TN) content and (D, E, F) between the bulk density (BD) and SOC for the three dominant land uses in Naiman Banner.
Fig 7Vertical distribution of the (a) soil organic carbon (SOC) density and (b) total nitrogen (TN) density to a depth of 100 cm. Data points were plotted at the bottom of each soil layer. Values are means ± SE.
Parameters of the variogram models for the soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) densities to a depth of 100 cm in Naiman Banner.
| Model for SOC | Model for TN | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spherical | Exponential | Gaussian | Spherical | Exponential | Gaussian | |
| 49417.68 | 55967.63 | 41594.67 | 40496.23 | 58837.75 | 34741.93 | |
| 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.3 | |
| 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.5 | 0.36 | |
| 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.66 | |
| 38.84% | 31.89% | 45.72% | 37.60% | 30.18% | 45.69% | |
| 61.16% | 68.11% | 54.28% | 62.40% | 69.82% | 54.31% | |
Fig 8Interpolated distributions (by simple kriging) of the soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) densities to a depth of 100 cm in Naiman Banner.
Mean values of the soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) densities to a depth of 100 cm in the alluvial plains, sandy land, and low hills of Naiman Banner.
| Mean density (kg m-2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Alluvial plains | Sandy land | Low hills | |
| 4.96 ± 0.45a | 2.92 ± 0.28b | 5.43 ± 0.24a | |
| 0.53 ± 0.05a | 0.31 ± 0.03b | 0.62 ± 0.03a | |
For a given parameter, values labeled with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05; one-way ANOVA, followed by LSD test).