Mary De Almeida1, Catherine Gerard2, Joshua T Freeman1, Eamon Duffy3, Sally A Roberts1. 1. Clinical Microbiologist, Department of Microbiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland. 2. Evaluation Manager, New Zealand Health Quality & Safety Commission, Wellington. 3. Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacist, Adult Infectious Diseases Service, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland.
Abstract
AIM: This study aims to determine the indications for antibiotic use in patients discharged following major surgery at Auckland City Hospital (ACH); to determine if the indications were appropriate and to identify opportunities where antimicrobial stewardship interventions would be beneficial. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients who were dispensed an antibiotic within the first two days of discharge after major surgery at ACH between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013. The indication for antibiotic use was determined and subsequently classified as either 'appropriate', 'not assessable' or 'inappropriate'. RESULTS: Among the 378 patients analysed, an indication for antibiotic use was not documented in 52 patients (13.8%). Antibiotics were prescribed for an established infection in 172 patients (45.5%), as empiric therapy in 100 patients (26.4%), and as prolonged surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in 41 patients (10.8%). Overall, nearly half of the antibiotic courses dispensed (48.7%) were either 'inappropriate' or the indication was 'not assessable'. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a significant proportion of antibiotics prescribed in patients discharged following surgery are inappropriate and there is need for enhanced antimicrobial stewardship in this area.
AIM: This study aims to determine the indications for antibiotic use in patients discharged following major surgery at Auckland City Hospital (ACH); to determine if the indications were appropriate and to identify opportunities where antimicrobial stewardship interventions would be beneficial. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients who were dispensed an antibiotic within the first two days of discharge after major surgery at ACH between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013. The indication for antibiotic use was determined and subsequently classified as either 'appropriate', 'not assessable' or 'inappropriate'. RESULTS: Among the 378 patients analysed, an indication for antibiotic use was not documented in 52 patients (13.8%). Antibiotics were prescribed for an established infection in 172 patients (45.5%), as empiric therapy in 100 patients (26.4%), and as prolonged surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in 41 patients (10.8%). Overall, nearly half of the antibiotic courses dispensed (48.7%) were either 'inappropriate' or the indication was 'not assessable'. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a significant proportion of antibiotics prescribed in patients discharged following surgery are inappropriate and there is need for enhanced antimicrobial stewardship in this area.