| Literature DB >> 29771870 |
Yu-Hua Song1, Chun Qiao2,3, Li-Chan Xiao2, Run Zhang2, Hua - Lu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of the current study was to guide the early clinical treatment strategies by assessing the recovery of abnormal coagulation in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients during induction therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective analysis was performed in 112 newly-diagnosed patients with APL during induction treatment. RESULTS The early death (ED) rate in our study was 5.36% and the main cause was fetal hemorrhage. The presence of bleeding symptoms was significantly correlated with low platelet and fibrinogen levels. The values of white blood cell (WBC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, and bone marrow leukemic promyelocyte in the high-risk group were significantly different from those in the low/intermediate-risk groups. Coagulation variables significantly improved after dual induction therapy. No significant difference was found in changes of platelet (PLT), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimers, and fibrinogen among different risk groups after induction therapy. D-dimer levels were initially high and remained well above normal after 4 weeks of induction therapy. CONCLUSIONS Aggressive prophylactic transfusion to maintain high platelet and fibrinogen transfusion thresholds could reduce hemorrhage in APL patients. Immediately starting induction therapy effectively alleviated coagulopathy in APL patients. Hyperfibrinolysis was a more important event in the APL hemorrhagic diathesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29771870 PMCID: PMC5985706 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.909938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Baseline laboratory parameters of acute promyelocytic leukemia cases.
| Laboratory parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Age (years), median (range) | 41 (12–75) |
| Gender, Male/Female | 66/46 |
| WBC (×109/L), median (range) | 11.22 (0.30–89.98) |
| HB (g/L), median (range) | 86.03 (29–146) |
| PLT (×109/L), median (range) | 33 (5–231) |
| LDH(U/L), median (range) | 422.41 (121–3571) |
| BMP(%), median (range) | 82.62 (47.6–97.2) |
| Sanz risk groups | |
| Low-risk group | 22 (19.64%) |
| Intermediate-risk group | 63 (56.25%) |
| High-risk group | 27 (24.11%) |
Main characteristics of our series and comparison patients between bleeding and no bleeding.
| Characteristics | No bleeding (n=15) | Bleeding (n=91) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, (years), median ±SD | 38.87±13.69 | 41.27±14.69 | 0.554 |
| Gender, Male/Female | 12/3 | 49/42 | 0.058 |
| WBC (×109/L), median ±SD | 5.39±16.63 | 11.50±18.97 | 0.243 |
| HB (g/L), median ±SD | 83.60±25.70 | 86.57±25.09 | 0.673 |
| PLT (×109/L), median ±SD | 68.07±65.57 | 27.80±19.03 | 0.033 |
| LDH (U/L), median ±SD | 229.47±123.76 | 430.67±519.86 | 0.140 |
| PT (s), median ±SD | 13.21±1.70 | 14.85±3.67 | 0.094 |
| APTT (s), median ±SD | 27.41±5.59 | 27.07±4.62 | 0.794 |
| Fbg (g/L), median ±SD | 1.86±0.94 | 1.24±0.79 | 0.007 |
| D-D (ug/ml), median ±SD | 7.58±10.92 | 9.40±13.22 | 0.651 |
| BMP (%), median ±SD | 81.52±8.00 | 82.51±9.49 | 0.703 |
Main characteristics of our series and comparison patients between low/intermediate-risk group and high-risk group.
| Characteristics | Low/intermediate-risk group (n=81) | High-risk group (n=25) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, (years), median ±SD | 40.28±14.05 | 43.04±16.05 | 0.409 |
| Gender, Male/Female | 45/36 | 16/9 | 0.455 |
| WBC (×109/L), median ±SD | 2.55±2.04 | 36.85±24.08 | 0.000 |
| HB (g/L), median ±SD | 84.11±24.96 | 92.76±24.79 | 0.132 |
| PLT (×109/L), median ±SD | 34.53±35.10 | 30.16±24.76 | 0.564 |
| LDH (U/L), median ±SD | 275.01±154.40 | 814.28±856.25 | 0.000 |
| PT (s), median ±SD | 13.71±1.68 | 17.54±5.73 | 0.000 |
| APTT (s), median ±SD | 26.83±4.52 | 28.03±5.41 | 0.273 |
| Fbg (g/L), median ±SD | 1.49±0.86 | 0.84±0.48 | 0.000 |
| D-D (ug/ml), median ±SD | 9.46±13.36 | 10.73±13.60 | 0.683 |
| BMP (%), median ±SD | 81.36±9.41 | 85.66±8.11 | 0.042 |
Figure 1The changes of hemostatic variables over time in different risk patients. The high-risk graph is represented as and the low/intermediate-risk graph as . * The result of high-risk group was significantly different from low/intermediate-risk group at the same time. (A) PLT changes during 4 weeks of introduction, PTimes<0.001, PGroups=0.309. (B) PT changes during 4 weeks of introduction, PTimes<0.001, PGroups=0.014. (C) APTT changes during 4 weeks of introduction, PTimes<0.001, PGroups=0.641. (D) D-dimer changes during 4 weeks of introduction, PTimes<0.001, PGroups=0.756. (E) Fbg changes during 4 weeks of introduction, PTimes<0.001, PGroups=0.392.