BACKGROUND: Resection is the only option for potential cure in pancreatic cancer. Patients admitted for resection may have the procedure deferred during their hospitalization. We aim to identify factors that lead pancreatic cancer patients to undergo resection. METHODS: An analysis utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, 2003-2009. Study population included adults (≥18 years) with pancreatic cancer who underwent either pancreatic resection or other interventions. Surgeon volume classified based on the median into low and high-volume surgeon. RESULTS: Eleven thousand three hundred and sixty-five patients were included; 68.0% underwent pancreatic resection, while 32.0% had other interventions. The majority of patients resected were <60 years old, female, with higher annual household income (P<0.05 for all). Patients with Medicaid coverage and comorbidity scores ≥2 were least likely to undergo pancreatic resection. Resection was more likely for high-volume surgeons, high-volume hospitals and teaching hospitals (P<0.05 for all). Those managed by high-volume surgeons were at a lower risk of postoperative complications, lower mortality, shorter hospital stay, and lower healthcare costs (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' insurance type and economic status are significantly associated with their ability to achieve pancreatic resection. Surgeon experience and hospital volumes were also significantly associated with pancreatic resection, clinical and economic outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Resection is the only option for potential cure in pancreatic cancer. Patients admitted for resection may have the procedure deferred during their hospitalization. We aim to identify factors that lead pancreatic cancer patients to undergo resection. METHODS: An analysis utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, 2003-2009. Study population included adults (≥18 years) with pancreatic cancer who underwent either pancreatic resection or other interventions. Surgeon volume classified based on the median into low and high-volume surgeon. RESULTS: Eleven thousand three hundred and sixty-five patients were included; 68.0% underwent pancreatic resection, while 32.0% had other interventions. The majority of patients resected were <60 years old, female, with higher annual household income (P<0.05 for all). Patients with Medicaid coverage and comorbidity scores ≥2 were least likely to undergo pancreatic resection. Resection was more likely for high-volume surgeons, high-volume hospitals and teaching hospitals (P<0.05 for all). Those managed by high-volume surgeons were at a lower risk of postoperative complications, lower mortality, shorter hospital stay, and lower healthcare costs (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' insurance type and economic status are significantly associated with their ability to achieve pancreatic resection. Surgeon experience and hospital volumes were also significantly associated with pancreatic resection, clinical and economic outcomes.
Authors: Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: N Tjarda van Heek; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Rob J Scholten; Steve M M de Castro; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik; Huug Obertop; Dirk J Gouma Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jason A Zell; Jessica M Rhee; Argyrios Ziogas; Steven M Lipkin; Hoda Anton-Culver Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Melissa M Murphy; William J Knaus; Sing Chau Ng; Joshua S Hill; James T McPhee; Shimul A Shah; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.647