Literature DB >> 29770063

Evidence for optimal HIV testing intervals in HIV-negative individuals from various risk groups: a systematic review protocol.

G P Traversy1, T Austin1, J Yau1, K Timmerman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based recommendations for HIV testing are essential for health care providers. However, it is unclear whether there is sufficient evidence to support recommendations for HIV testing frequencies in a variety of HIV risk groups.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this document is to outline the methodological protocol of a systematic review that would gather evidence for the optimal frequency of HIV testing among individuals in various HIV risk groups with respect to personal and public health outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
METHODS: This protocol adheres to the PRISMA-P reporting items, and the review is registered with PROSPERO. The target population includes individuals who may have undiagnosed HIV infection. Different frequencies of HIV testing will be compared and outcomes to do with personal and public health, patient values/preferences and costs will be examined. The search strategy will encompass searches in MEDLINE/Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, PsychINFO, and EconLit, as well as grey literature sources. Articles will be screened by title/abstract, and subsequently by full-text, in duplicate. Extraction of pertinent data from the screened references will be carried out by one reviewer and verified by a second. Multiple critical appraisal tools will be used to assess individual study quality, and the GRADE approach will be used to appraise the overall quality of the evidence. Data will be synthesized narratively, and the results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. DISCUSSION: This systematic review, designed with extensive input from content experts, will help to identify key evidence to inform recommendations for HIV testing frequency.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29770063      PMCID: PMC5757700          DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v43i02a02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep        ISSN: 1188-4169


  15 in total

1.  Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.

Authors:  Susan Armijo-Olivo; Carla R Stiles; Neil A Hagen; Patricia D Biondo; Greta G Cummings
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions.

Authors:  B H Thomas; D Ciliska; M Dobbins; S Micucci
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

Authors:  J J Deeks; J Dinnes; R D'Amico; A J Sowden; C Sakarovitch; F Song; M Petticrew; D G Altman
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Estimating sexual transmission of HIV from persons aware and unaware that they are infected with the virus in the USA.

Authors:  Gary Marks; Nicole Crepaz; Robert S Janssen
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 5.  Antiretroviral therapy for prevention is a combination strategy.

Authors:  Margaret L McNairy; Myron Cohen; Wafaa M El-Sadr
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.071

6.  GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Victor Montori; Gunn Vist; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ben Djulbegovic; David Atkins; Yngve Falck-Ytter; John W Williams; Joerg Meerpohl; Susan L Norris; Elie A Akl; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in Early Asymptomatic HIV Infection.

Authors:  Jens D Lundgren; Abdel G Babiker; Fred Gordin; Sean Emery; Birgit Grund; Shweta Sharma; Anchalee Avihingsanon; David A Cooper; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Josep M Llibre; Jean-Michel Molina; Paula Munderi; Mauro Schechter; Robin Wood; Karin L Klingman; Simon Collins; H Clifford Lane; Andrew N Phillips; James D Neaton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.

Authors:  Larissa Shamseer; David Moher; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-02

10.  Canadian and international recommendations on the frequency of HIV screening and testing: A systematic review.

Authors:  T Austin; G P Traversy; S Ha; K Timmerman
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2016-08-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evidence for optimal HIV screening and testing intervals in HIV-negative individuals from various risk groups: A systematic review.

Authors:  K Timmerman; M Weekes; G Traversy; P Prabakhar; T Austin; S Ha; B Anwar
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2018-12-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.