Literature DB >> 29769819

Structural and Biomechanical Adaptations to Free-Fall Landing in Hindlimb Cortical Bone of Growing Female Rats.

Hsin-Shih Lin1,2, Ho-Seng Wang2, Hung-Ta Chiu1, Kuang-You B Cheng1, Ar-Tyan Hsu3, Tsang-Hai Huang1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the adaptation process of hindlimb cortical bone subjected to free-fall landing training. Female Wistar rats (7 weeks old) were randomly assigned to four landing (L) groups and four age-matched control (C) groups (n = 12 per group): L1, L2, L4 L8, C1, C2, C4 and C8. Animals in the L1, L2, L4 and L8 groups were respectively subjected to 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks of free-fall-landing training (40 cm height, 30 times/day and 5 days/week) while the C1, C2, C4 and C8 groups served as age-matched control groups. The tibiae of the L8 group were higher in cortical bone mineral content (BMC) than those in the C8 group (p < 0.05). Except for the higher bone mineralization over bone surface ratio (MS/BS, %) shown in the tibiae of the L1 group (p < 0.05), dynamic histomorphometry in the tibial and femoral cortical bone showed no difference between landing groups and their age-matched control groups. In the femora, the L1 group was lower than the C1 group in cortical bone area (Ct.Ar) and cortical thickness (Ct.Th) (p < 0.05); however, the L4 group was higher than the C4 group in Ct.Ar and Ct.Th (p <0 .05). In the tibiae, the moment of inertia about the antero-posterior axis (Iap), Ct.Ar and Ct.Th was significantly higher in the L8 group than in the C8 group (p < 0.05). In biomechanical testing, fracture load (FL) of femora was lower in the L1 group than in the C1 group (p < 0.05). Conversely, yield load (YL), FL and yield load energy (YE) of femora, as well as FL of tibiae were all significantly higher in the L8 group than in the C8 group (p < 0.05). Free-fall landing training may initially compromise bone material. However, over time, the current free-fall landing training induced improvements in biomechanical properties and/or the structure of growing bones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical loading; animal model; bone strength; exercise

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29769819      PMCID: PMC5950735     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  45 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling.

Authors:  Alexander G Robling; Alesha B Castillo; Charles H Turner
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 2.  Musculoskeletal design in relation to body size.

Authors:  A A Biewener
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The use of external transducers for estimating bone strain at the distal tibia during impact activity.

Authors:  W Brent Edwards; Erin D Ward; Stacey A Meardon; Timothy R Derrick
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Five jumps per day increase bone mass and breaking force in rats.

Authors:  Y Umemura; T Ishiko; T Yamauchi; M Kurono; S Mashiko
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial.

Authors:  C H Turner; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage.

Authors:  D B Burr; R B Martin; M B Schaffler; E L Radin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Cellular kinetics of the bone remodeling sequence in the rat.

Authors:  P T Tran Van; A Vignery; R Baron
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1982-04

8.  Effects of tower climbing exercise on bone mass, strength, and turnover in growing rats.

Authors:  T Notomi; N Okimoto; Y Okazaki; Y Tanaka; T Nakamura; M Suzuki
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Inducible cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2) mediates the induction of bone formation by mechanical loading in vivo.

Authors:  M R Forwood
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin.

Authors:  Alexander G Robling; Paul J Niziolek; Lee A Baldridge; Keith W Condon; Matthew R Allen; Imranul Alam; Sara M Mantila; Jelica Gluhak-Heinrich; Teresita M Bellido; Stephen E Harris; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.