Literature DB >> 29769435

Defining and quantifying users' mental imagery-based BCI skills: a first step.

Fabien Lotte1, Camille Jeunet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While promising for many applications, electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are still scarcely used outside laboratories, due to a poor reliability. It is thus necessary to study and fix this reliability issue. Doing so requires the use of appropriate reliability metrics to quantify both the classification algorithm and the BCI user's performances. So far, classification accuracy (CA) is the typical metric used for both aspects. However, we argue in this paper that CA is a poor metric to study BCI users' skills. Here, we propose a definition and new metrics to quantify such BCI skills for mental imagery (MI) BCIs, independently of any classification algorithm. APPROACH: We first show in this paper that CA is notably unspecific, discrete, training data and classifier dependent, and as such may not always reflect successful self-modulation of EEG patterns by the user. We then propose a definition of MI-BCI skills that reflects how well the user can self-modulate EEG patterns, and thus how well he could control an MI-BCI. Finally, we propose new performance metrics, classDis, restDist and classStab that specifically measure how distinct and stable the EEG patterns produced by the user are, independently of any classifier. MAIN
RESULTS: By re-analyzing EEG data sets with such new metrics, we indeed confirmed that CA may hide some increase in MI-BCI skills or hide the user inability to self-modulate a given EEG pattern. On the other hand, our new metrics could reveal such skill improvements as well as identify when a mental task performed by a user was no different than rest EEG. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results showed that when studying MI-BCI users' skills, CA should be used with care, and complemented with metrics such as the new ones proposed. Our results also stressed the need to redefine BCI user training by considering the different BCI subskills and their measures. To promote the complementary use of our new metrics, we provide the Matlab code to compute them for free and open-source.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29769435     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aac577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  5 in total

1.  Embodiment Comfort Levels During Motor Imagery Training Combined With Immersive Virtual Reality in a Spinal Cord Injury Patient.

Authors:  Carla Pais-Vieira; Pedro Gaspar; Demétrio Matos; Leonor Palminha Alves; Bárbara Moreira da Cruz; Maria João Azevedo; Miguel Gago; Tânia Poleri; André Perrotta; Miguel Pais-Vieira
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Long-Term BCI Training of a Tetraplegic User: Adaptive Riemannian Classifiers and User Training.

Authors:  Camille Benaroch; Khadijeh Sadatnejad; Aline Roc; Aurélien Appriou; Thibaut Monseigne; Smeety Pramij; Jelena Mladenovic; Léa Pillette; Camille Jeunet; Fabien Lotte
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Exploring Training Effect in 42 Human Subjects Using a Non-invasive Sensorimotor Rhythm Based Online BCI.

Authors:  Jianjun Meng; Bin He
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Challenge Accepted? Individual Performance Gains for Motor Imagery Practice with Humanoid Robotic EEG Neurofeedback.

Authors:  Mareike Daeglau; Frank Wallhoff; Stefan Debener; Ignatius Sapto Condro; Cornelia Kranczioch; Catharina Zich
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  A Comprehensive Review on Critical Issues and Possible Solutions of Motor Imagery Based Electroencephalography Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Amardeep Singh; Ali Abdul Hussain; Sunil Lal; Hans W Guesgen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.