Literature DB >> 29768942

Updated meta-review of evidence on support for carers.

Jane Dalton1, Sian Thomas1, Melissa Harden2, Alison Eastwood3, Gillian Parker4.   

Abstract

Objective To update a 2010 meta-review of systematic reviews of effective interventions to support carers of ill, disabled, or older adults. In this article, we report the most promising interventions based on the best available evidence. Methods Rapid meta-review of systematic reviews published from January 2009 to 2016. Results Sixty-one systematic reviews were included (27 high quality, 25 medium quality, and nine low quality). The quality of reviews has improved since the original review, but primary studies remain limited in quality and quantity. Fourteen high quality reviews focused on carers of people with dementia, four on carers of those with cancer, four on carers of people with stroke, three on carers of those at the end of life with various conditions, and two on carers of people with mental health problems. Multicomponent interventions featured prominently, emphasizing psychosocial or psychoeducational content, education and training. Improved outcomes for carers were reported for mental health, burden and stress, and wellbeing or quality of life. Negative effects were reported in reviews of respite care. As with earlier work, we found little robust evidence on the cost-effectiveness of reviewed interventions. Conclusions There is no 'one size fits all' intervention to support carers. There is potential for effective support in specific groups of carers, such as shared learning, cognitive reframing, meditation, and computer-delivered psychosocial support for carers of people with dementia. For carers of people with cancer, effective support may include psychosocial interventions, art therapy, and counselling. Carers of people with stroke may also benefit from counselling. More good quality, theory-based, primary research is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carers; interventions; meta-review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29768942     DOI: 10.1177/1355819618766559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Dementia - View of sufferers and their relatives].

Authors:  Rainer Schaub; Heike von Lützau-Hohlbein
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 2.  Family caregiving research: Reflecting on the past to inform the future.

Authors:  Jill I Cameron
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Effectiveness of interventions to address the negative health outcomes of informal caregiving to older adults: protocol for an umbrella review.

Authors:  Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga; Mariam Kirvalidze; Lena Dahlberg; Lawrence B Sacco; Lucas Morin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Psychological Impact of the Very Early Beginning of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Healthcare Workers: A Bayesian Study on the Italian and Swiss Perspectives.

Authors:  Sara Uccella; Francesco Mongelli; Pietro Majno-Hurst; Luca Jacopo Pavan; Stefano Uccella; Cesare Zoia; Laura Uccella
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  Delivering a holistic hospital-to-home framework to support family caregivers of persons with dementia: Protocol for a feasibility study.

Authors:  Ee-Yuee Chan; George Frederick Glass
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.057

6.  Caregiver Experiences and Roles in Care Seeking During COPD Exacerbations: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Madhuvanthi Suresh; Jessica Young; Vincent Fan; Carol Simons; Catherine Battaglia; Tracy L Simpson; John C Fortney; Emily R Locke; Ranak Trivedi
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2022-03-01

7.  Social Innovation in Long-Term Care: Lessons from the Italian Case.

Authors:  Georgia Casanova; Andrea Principi; Giovanni Lamura
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.