Literature DB >> 29768645

Outcomes after endoscopic resection of large laterally spreading lesions of the papilla and conventional ampullary adenomas are equivalent.

Amir Klein1, Zhengyan Qi1, Farzan F Bahin1,2, Halim Awadie1, Dhruv Nayyar1, Michael Ma1, Rogier P Voermans1, Stephen J Williams1, Eric Lee1, Michael J Bourke1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection of ampullary adenomas is a safe and effective alternative to surgical resection. A subgroup of patients have large laterally spreading lesions of the papilla Vateri (LSL-P), which are frequently managed surgically. Data on endoscopic resection of LSL-P are limited and long-term outcomes are unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of endoscopic resection of LSL-P with those of standard ampullary adenomas.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected and maintained database was conducted. LSL-P was defined as extension of the lesion ≥ 10 mm from the edge of the ampullary mound. Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of the laterally spreading component was followed by resection of the ampulla. Patient, lesion, and procedural data, as well as results of endoscopic follow-up, were collected.
RESULTS: 125 lesions were resected. Complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 97.6 % at the index procedure (median lesion size 20 mm, interquartile range [IQR] 13 - 30 mm). Compared with ampullary adenomas, LSL-Ps were significantly larger (median 35 mm vs. 15 mm), contained a higher rate of advanced pathology (38.6 % vs. 18.5 %), and had higher rates of intraprocedural bleeding (50 % vs. 24.7 %) and delayed bleeding (25.0 % vs. 12.3 %). Both groups had similar rates of histologically proven recurrence at first surveillance (16.4 % vs. 17.9 %). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 18.5 months. For patients with at least two surveillance endoscopies (n = 68; median follow-up 29 months, IQR 18 - 48 months), 95.6 % were clear of disease and considered cured.
CONCLUSIONS: LSL-P can be resected endoscopically with comparable outcomes to standard ampullectomy, albeit with a higher risk of bleeding. Endoscopic treatment should be considered as an alternative to surgical resection, even for large LSL-P. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29768645     DOI: 10.1055/a-0587-5228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  8 in total

1.  Pearls and Pitfalls of Endoscopic Resection ofDuodenal Adenomas.

Authors:  Peter V Draganov
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-03

2.  Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Adenomas.

Authors:  Nadav Sahar; Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Richard A Kozarek; Michael Gluck; Michael Larsen; Andrew S Ross; Shayan Irani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Clinical outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy of ampullary adenoma: A multi-center study.

Authors:  Seong Ji Choi; Hong Sik Lee; Jiyeong Kim; Jung Wan Choe; Jae Min Lee; Jong Jin Hyun; Jai Hoon Yoon; Hyo Jung Kim; Jae Seon Kim; Ho Soon Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 5.374

4.  Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm-A Pancreas2000/EPC Study.

Authors:  Marcus Hollenbach; Einas Abou Ali; Francesco Auriemma; Aiste Gulla; Christian Heise; Sara Regnér; Sébastien Gaujoux
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 5.  Methods and outcome of the endoscopic treatment of ampullary tumors.

Authors:  Jan-Werner Poley; Sara Campos
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-01-21

Review 6.  Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Endoscopic and Surgical Resection for Ampullary Lesions.

Authors:  Christian Heise; Einas Abou Ali; Dirk Hasenclever; Francesco Auriemma; Aiste Gulla; Sara Regner; Sébastien Gaujoux; Marcus Hollenbach
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Jeska A Fritzsche; Amir Klein; Maarten J Beekman; Jeanin E van Hooft; Mayenaaz Sidhu; Scott Schoeman; Paul Fockens; Michael J Bourke; Rogier P Voermans
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Expert consensus on endoscopic papillectomy using a Delphi process.

Authors:  Jeska A Fritzsche; Paul Fockens; Marc Barthet; Marco J Bruno; David L Carr-Locke; Guido Costamagna; Gregory A Coté; Pierre H Deprez; Marc Giovannini; Gregory B Haber; Robert H Hawes; Jong Jin Hyun; Takao Itoi; Eisuke Iwasaki; Leena Kylänpaä; Horst Neuhaus; Jeong Youp Park; D Nageshwar Reddy; Arata Sakai; Michael J Bourke; Rogier P Voermans
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 9.427

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.