Literature DB >> 2976837

Resolving arguments about the sanctity of life: a response to Long.

P Singer1, H Kuhse.   

Abstract

Thomas Long has argued that there is an irreconcilable metaphysical difference between the views of those who, like ourselves, believe that on quality-of-life grounds it is sometimes justifiable to end the life of a severely handicapped infant, and those who, like Paul Ramsey, reject this view. Because of this metaphysical difference, Long considers it impossible for our arguments to refute Ramsey's position. We disagree.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Death and Euthanasia; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2976837      PMCID: PMC1375583          DOI: 10.1136/jme.14.4.198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Infanticide for handicapped infants: sometimes it's a metaphysical dispute.

Authors:  T A Long
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Two philosophers in search of a contradiction: a response to Singer and Kuhse.

Authors:  T A Long
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Prolonging dying is the same as prolonging living--one more response to Long.

Authors:  H Kuhse; P Singer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.