Literature DB >> 29768186

Predicted reach consequences drive time course of tactile suppression.

Lindsey E Fraser1, Katja Fiehler2.   

Abstract

Sensitivity to touch is reduced during movement; this tactile suppression is likely the result of a mechanism that suppresses self-generated movement consequences. We sought to determine whether tactile suppression is modulated by naturally evoked changes in movement speed driven by task precision demands (Exp.1), and by changes in predicted movement consequences (Exp.2). We measured suppression by comparing detection thresholds for a vibration applied to the finger during reach and at rest. In Experiment 1 we varied reach target size to create a speed-accuracy tradeoff, where participants decelerated more to smaller targets to accurately hit them. We theorized that the reduction in late-reach speed associated with higher precision demands might lead to a reduction in late-reach suppression, consistent with the literature showing a positive relationship between speed and suppression. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found suppression increased towards the end of the reach in all conditions, despite a significant decrease in reaching speed. We postulated this might be a de-emphasizing of the predicted tactile feedback associated with tapping the target. To test this, in Experiment 2 we paired a vibration consequence with a target of a certain colour. We found an increase in late-reach suppression for this target compared to a target of another colour with no associated consequence. Our results indicate that tactile suppression is temporally sensitive and increases as predicted consequences become more likely. We propose the positive correlation between movement speed and suppression previously reported may be driven by the predicted somatosensory consequences associated with increased movement speed.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prediction; Reaching; Speed; Suppression; Tactile; Touch

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29768186     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Tactile suppression stems from specific sensorimotor predictions.

Authors:  Elena Fuehrer; Dimitris Voudouris; Alexandra Lezkan; Knut Drewing; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Dynamic temporal modulation of somatosensory processing during reaching.

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression.

Authors:  Marie C Beyvers; Lindsey E Fraser; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Predictive attenuation of touch and tactile gating are distinct perceptual phenomena.

Authors:  Konstantina Kilteni; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-14

5.  Sensorimotor Integration and Pain Perception: Mechanisms Integrating Nociceptive Processing. A Systematic Review and ALE-Meta Analysis.

Authors:  Cindy Gombaut; Scott A Holmes
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-05

6.  Vision facilitates tactile perception when grasping an object.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Francisco L Colino; Xhino Meleqi; Gordon Binsted; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.