William J Sandborn1, Bal R Bhandari2, Charles Randall3, Ziad H Younes4, Tomasz Romanczyk5, Yan Xin6, Emily Wendt6, Hao Chai6, Matt McKevitt6, Sally Zhao6, John S Sundy6, Satish Keshav7, Silvio Danese8. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 2. Delta Research Partners, Monroe, LA, USA. 3. Gastroenterology Research America and University of Texas, San Antonio, TX, USA. 4. Gastro One, Germantown, TN, USA. 5. H-T Centrum Medyczne, Tychy, Poland. 6. Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA. 7. Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 8. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP9] is implicated in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis [UC] via disruption of intestinal barrier integrity and function. A phase 2/3 combined trial was designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the anti-MMP9 antibody, andecaliximab [formerly GS-5745], in patients with moderately to severely active UC. METHODS: Patients were randomised [1:1:1] to receive placebo, 150 mg andecaliximab every 2 weeks [Q2W], or 150 mg andecaliximab weekly [QW], via subcutaneous administration. The primary endpoint was endoscopy/bleeding/stool [EBS]-defined clinical remission [endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1, rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and at least a 1-point decrease from baseline in stool frequency to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1] at Week 8. The phase 2/3 trial met prespecified futility criteria and was terminated before completion. This study describes results from the 8-week induction phase. RESULTS: Neither 150 mg andecaliximab Q2W or QW resulted in a significant increase vs placebo in the proportion of patients achieving EBS clinical remission at Week 8. Remission rates [95% confidence intervals] were 7.3% [2.0%-17.6%], 7.4% [2.1%-17.9%], and 1.8% [0.0%-9.6%] in the placebo, andecaliximab Q2W, and andecaliximab QW groups, respectively. Similarly, Mayo Clinic Score response, endoscopic response, and mucosal [histological] healing did not differ among groups. Rates of adverse events were comparable among andecaliximab and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Eight weeks of induction treatment with 150 mg andecaliximab in patients with UC did not induce clinical remission or response. Andecaliximab was well tolerated and pharmacokinetic properties were consistent with those previously reported.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP9] is implicated in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis [UC] via disruption of intestinal barrier integrity and function. A phase 2/3 combined trial was designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the anti-MMP9 antibody, andecaliximab [formerly GS-5745], in patients with moderately to severely active UC. METHODS:Patients were randomised [1:1:1] to receive placebo, 150 mg andecaliximab every 2 weeks [Q2W], or 150 mg andecaliximab weekly [QW], via subcutaneous administration. The primary endpoint was endoscopy/bleeding/stool [EBS]-defined clinical remission [endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1, rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and at least a 1-point decrease from baseline in stool frequency to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1] at Week 8. The phase 2/3 trial met prespecified futility criteria and was terminated before completion. This study describes results from the 8-week induction phase. RESULTS: Neither 150 mg andecaliximab Q2W or QW resulted in a significant increase vs placebo in the proportion of patients achieving EBS clinical remission at Week 8. Remission rates [95% confidence intervals] were 7.3% [2.0%-17.6%], 7.4% [2.1%-17.9%], and 1.8% [0.0%-9.6%] in the placebo, andecaliximab Q2W, and andecaliximab QW groups, respectively. Similarly, Mayo Clinic Score response, endoscopic response, and mucosal [histological] healing did not differ among groups. Rates of adverse events were comparable among andecaliximab and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Eight weeks of induction treatment with 150 mg andecaliximab in patients with UC did not induce clinical remission or response. Andecaliximab was well tolerated and pharmacokinetic properties were consistent with those previously reported.
Authors: Gábor Lakatos; Ferenc Sipos; Pál Miheller; István Hritz; Mária Zsófia Varga; Márk Juhász; Béla Molnár; Zsolt Tulassay; László Herszényi Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: M D Baugh; M J Perry; A P Hollander; D R Davies; S S Cross; A J Lobo; C J Taylor; G S Evans Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Brian Bressler; John K Marshall; Charles N Bernstein; Alain Bitton; Jennifer Jones; Grigorios I Leontiadis; Remo Panaccione; A Hillary Steinhart; Francis Tse; Brian Feagan Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: William J Sandborn; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Subrata Ghosh; Bruce E Sands; Gerald Dryden; Xavier Hébuterne; Rupert W Leong; Brian Bressler; Thomas Ullman; Peter L Lakatos; Walter Reinisch; Li-An Xu; Allison Luo Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Brian G Feagan; Paul Rutgeerts; Bruce E Sands; Stephen Hanauer; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; William J Sandborn; Gert Van Assche; Jeffrey Axler; Hyo-Jong Kim; Silvio Danese; Irving Fox; Catherine Milch; Serap Sankoh; Tim Wyant; Jing Xu; Asit Parikh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Colleen Marano; Hongyan Zhang; Richard Strauss; Jewel Johanns; Omoniyi J Adedokun; Cynthia Guzzo; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Walter Reinisch; Peter R Gibson; Judith Collins; Gunnar Järnerot; Toshifumi Hibi; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-06-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Stephan C Bischoff; Giovanni Barbara; Wim Buurman; Theo Ockhuizen; Jörg-Dieter Schulzke; Matteo Serino; Herbert Tilg; Alastair Watson; Jerry M Wells Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 3.067