Literature DB >> 29767688

Safety and dose modification for patients receiving niraparib.

J S Berek1, U A Matulonis2, U Peen3, P Ghatage4, S Mahner5, A Redondo6, A Lesoin7, N Colombo8, I Vergote9, O Rosengarten10, J Ledermann11, M Pineda12, S Ellard13, J Sehouli14, A Gonzalez-Martin15, D Berton-Rigaud16, R Madry17, A Reinthaller18, S Hazard19, W Guo20, M R Mirza21.   

Abstract

Background: Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved in the USA and Europe for maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. In the pivotal ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial, the dose reduction rate due to treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was 68.9%, and the discontinuation rate due to TEAE was 14.7%, including 3.3% due to thrombocytopenia. A retrospective analysis was carried out to identify clinical parameters that predict dose reductions. Patients and methods: All analyses were carried out on the safety population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Patients were analyzed according to the study drug consumed (i.e., as treated). A predictive modeling method (decision trees) was used to identify important variables for predicting the likelihood of developing grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia within 30 days after the first dose of niraparib and determine cut-off points for chosen variables.
Results: Following dose modification, 200 mg was the most commonly administered dose in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Baseline platelet count and baseline body weight were identified as risk factors for increased incidence of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. Patients with a baseline body weight <77 kg or a baseline platelet count <150 000/µl in effect received an average daily dose ∼200 mg (median = 207 mg) due to dose interruption and reduction. Progression-free survival in patients who were dose reduced to either 200 or 100 mg was consistent with that of patients who remained at the 300 mg starting dose. Conclusions: The analysis presented suggests that patients with baseline body weight of <77 kg or baseline platelets of <150 000/µl may benefit from a starting dose of 200 mg/day. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01847274.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29767688     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  36 in total

Review 1.  PARP inhibition in the ovarian cancer patient: Current approvals and future directions.

Authors:  Katherine C Kurnit; Monica Avila; Emily M Hinchcliff; Robert L Coleman; Shannon N Westin
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 12.310

2.  Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of Niraparib in Chinese Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Hong Zheng; Yunong Gao; Ge Lou; Rutie Yin; Dongmei Ji; Wenhua Li; Wei Wang; Bairong Xia; Danqing Wang; Jianmei Hou; James Yan; Yongjiang Hei; Zhi-Yi Zhang; Ashley Milton; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-08-22

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of PARP Inhibitors in Oncology.

Authors:  Maaike A C Bruin; Gabe S Sonke; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 5.577

Review 4.  Niraparib: A Review in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Young-A Heo; Sean T Duggan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 5.  Development of new medical treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Rosanna Mancari; Giuseppe Cutillo; Valentina Bruno; Cristina Vincenzoni; Emanuela Mancini; Ermelinda Baiocco; Simone Bruni; Giuseppe Vocaturo; Benito Chiofalo; Enrico Vizza
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

Review 6.  Movement of Poly-ADP Ribose (PARP) Inhibition into Frontline Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Michaela Onstad; Robert L Coleman; Shannon N Westin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  The efficacy and safety of niraparib for ovarian cancer: a single-center observational study from China.

Authors:  Jing Ni; Xianzhong Cheng; Qian Zhao; Zhiqin Dai; Xia Xu; Wenwen Guo; Hongyuan Gu; Rui Zhou; Yan Wang; Xiaoxiang Chen
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  Population exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses for rucaparib in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma from Study 10 and ARIEL2.

Authors:  Gottfried E Konecny; Amit M Oza; Anna V Tinker; Ana Oaknin; Ronnie Shapira-Frommer; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Carol Aghajanian; Robert L Coleman; David M O'Malley; Alexandra Leary; Lee-May Chen; Diane Provencher; Ling Ma; James D Brenton; Cesar Castro; Michelle Green; Andrew D Simmons; Jeri Beltman; Thomas Harding; Kevin K Lin; Sandra Goble; Lara Maloney; Rebecca S Kristeleit; Iain A McNeish; Elizabeth M Swisher; Jim J Xiao
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 9.  The efficacy and safety of the addition of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to therapy for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingzhu Yang; Nannan Du; Laidi Xie; Jing Jiang; Jiahang Mo; Jiaze Hong; Danyi Mao; Derry Minyao Ng; Huiwei Shi
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Real-world hematological adverse events in Chinese patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with an individualized starting dose of niraparib.

Authors:  Junjian Wang; Jianqing Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.