Literature DB >> 29767295

Violation of expectations about movement and goal achievement leads to Sense of Agency reduction.

Riccardo Villa1,2, Emmanuele Tidoni3,4, Giuseppina Porciello5,6, Salvatore Maria Aglioti5,6.   

Abstract

The control of one's own movements and of their impact on the external world generates a feeling of control referred to as Sense of Agency (SoA). SoA is experienced when actions match predictions and is reduced by unpredicted events. The present study investigated the contribution of monitoring two fundamental components of action-movement execution and goal achievement-that have been most often explored separately in previous research. We have devised a new paradigm in which participants performed goal-directed actions while viewing an avatar's hand in a mixed-reality scenario. The hand performed either the same action or a different one, simultaneously or after various delays. Movement of the virtual finger and goal attainment were manipulated, so that they could match or conflict with the participants' expectations. We collected judgments of correspondence (an explicit index of SoA that overcomes the tendency to over-attribute actions to oneself) by asking participants if the observed action was synchronous or not with their action. In keeping with previous studies, we found that monitoring both movement execution and goal attainment is relevant for SoA. Moreover, we expanded previous findings by showing that movement information may be a more constant source of SoA modulation than goal information. Indeed, an incongruent movement impaired SoA irrespective of delay duration, while a missed goal did so only when delays were short. Our novel paradigm allowed us to simultaneously manipulate multiple action features, a characteristic that makes it suitable for investigating the contribution of different sub-components of action in modulating SoA in healthy and clinical populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action monitoring; Goal; Mixed-reality; Movement; Sense of Agency

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29767295     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5286-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; C D Frith; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation.

Authors:  Chess Stetson; Xu Cui; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations.

Authors:  Chlöé Farrer; Scott H Frey; John D Van Horn; Eugene Tunik; David Turk; Souheil Inati; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior.

Authors:  Markus Ullsperger; Claudia Danielmeier; Gerhard Jocham
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  The time windows of the sense of agency.

Authors:  C Farrer; G Valentin; J M Hupé
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-10-24

6.  Action, prediction, and temporal awareness.

Authors:  Eamonn Walsh; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-01-20

7.  A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition.

Authors:  Manos Tsakiris; Patrick Haggard; Nicolas Franck; Nelly Mainy; Angela Sirigu
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-22

8.  Mere observation of body discontinuity affects perceived ownership and vicarious agency over a virtual hand.

Authors:  G Tieri; E Tidoni; E F Pavone; S M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency.

Authors:  Andrea Desantis; Cédric Roussel; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2011-03-10

10.  Whodunnit? Electrophysiological correlates of agency judgements.

Authors:  Simone Kühn; Ivan Nenchev; Patrick Haggard; Marcel Brass; Jürgen Gallinat; Martin Voss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  The "embreathment" illusion highlights the role of breathing in corporeal awareness.

Authors:  Alessandro Monti; Giuseppina Porciello; Gaetano Tieri; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visual feedback from a virtual body modulates motor illusion induced by tendon vibration.

Authors:  Gabriele Fusco; Gaetano Tieri; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-10

3.  Reduced ownership over a virtual body modulates dishonesty.

Authors:  Marina Scattolin; Maria Serena Panasiti; Riccardo Villa; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Freedom to act enhances the sense of agency, while movement and goal-related prediction errors reduce it.

Authors:  Riccardo Villa; Emmanuele Tidoni; Giuseppina Porciello; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-31

5.  Body ownership increases the interference between observed and executed movements.

Authors:  Dalila Burin; Konstantina Kilteni; Marco Rabuffetti; Mel Slater; Lorenzo Pia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.