| Literature DB >> 29767139 |
Li Xu1, Chao Ran1, Suxu He1, Jianli Zhang2, Jun Hu1, Yalin Yang1, Zhenyu Du3, Yanou Yang2, Zhigang Zhou1.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of dietary supplementation of yeast nucleotides on the growth, non-specific immunity, intestine growth and intestinal microbiota of juvenile hybrid tilapia. Tilapia (initial average weight of 8.02 g) was fed test diets supplemented with a yeast-originated nucleotide mixture (0, 0.15, 0.30, 0.60, and 1.20 g/100 g diet) for 8 weeks. Fish fed the diet with 0.60% nucleotide had significantly higher weight gain than the control group (P < 0.05). Feed efficiency was improved in the fish fed 0.60 and 1.20% nucleotide compared with that in the control group. The optimal doses of nucleotides supplementation for growth and feed efficiency of fish were determined as 0.63 and 0.81%, respectively. Intestinal growth was improved in the 0.30 and 0.60% groups, as indicated by significant increase in intestine length. The fish fed 0.60 and 1.20% nucleotide showed higher super oxide dismutase (SOD) activity and lower malondialdehyde (MDA) level in the liver than the control fish, indicating enhancement of the anti-oxidant status. Serum lysozyme activity was significantly increased in the 0.15 and 0.3% nucleotide supplementation groups, suggesting an enhancement effect on the non-specific immune response. Lastly, dietary nucleotides supplementation exerted moderate influence on the intestinal microbiota of hybrid tilapia. A reduction in the cumulative abundance of putative butyrate-producing species was observed in the intestinal microbiota of fish fed diets with 0.60% nucleotide compared with the control, implying an interaction between dietary nucleotides and butyrate production. Briefly, dietary supplementation with 0.60% nucleotide improve the growth performance, immune activity and intestine growth in tilapia.Entities:
Keywords: Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; Growth performance; Hybrid tilapia; Intestinal microbiota; Nucleotides
Year: 2015 PMID: 29767139 PMCID: PMC5945949 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.08.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Nutr ISSN: 2405-6383
Feed formulation and proximate composition of test diets used in the experiment.1
| Item | Control | 0.15% nucleotides | 0.30% nucleotides | 0.60% nucleotides | 1.20% nucleotides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White fishmeal | 14.00 | 14.00 | 14.00 | 14.00 | 14.00 |
| Fly maggot meal | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
| Soybean meal | 30.00 | 30.00 | 30.00 | 30.00 | 30.00 |
| Wheat | 42.00 | 42.00 | 42.00 | 42.00 | 42.00 |
| Vitamin C | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Mineral premix | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Choline chloride | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| α- starch (%) | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 |
| Zeolite powder | 4.25 | 4.10 | 3.95 | 3.65 | 3.05 |
| Yeast-originated NT | 0 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Dry matter | 92.1 | 92.1 | 92.1 | 92.1 | 92.1 |
| Crude protein | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 | 31.2 |
| Crude lipid | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Ash | 6.5 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 5.3 |
| Gross energy, MJ/100 g | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 |
Ingredient source: white fishmeal (Siberia, Russia), fly maggot meal (Shangdong, China), soybean meal (Jiangsu, China), wheat (Henan, China), vitamin C (Hebei, China), choline chloride (Hebei, China), a-starch (Jiangsu, China), zeolite powder (Hebei, China).
Contains (per kg premix): thiamin, 20 mg; riboflavin 20 mg; pyridoxine 20 mg; cyanocobalamine 0.020 mg; phylloquinone 10 mg; folic acid 5 mg; calcium patotheniate 50 mg; inositol 100 mg; niacin 100 mg; tocopherol 50 mg; biotin 0.1 mg; retinol 55,000 IU; cholecalciferol 10,000 IU; carrier up to 1 kg.
Contains (as g/kg premix): NaCl, 1 g; MgSO4·7H2O, 15 g; KH2PO4, 32 g; FeC6H5O7·5H2O, 0.25 g; C6H10CaO6·5H2O, 3.5 g; ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.353 g; MnSO4·4H2O, 0.162 g; CuSO4·5H2O, 0.031 g; CoCl2·6H2O, 0.001 g; KIO3, 0.003 g; carrier up to 1 kg.
Growth and developmental performance of hybrid tilapia after feeding nucleotide supplemented diets for eight weeks.
| Treatment | IBW, g | WG, % | FR | FE | IL:BL | IW:BW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 7.85 ± 0.23a | 265.46 ± 9.50a | 2.95 ± 0.04a | 0.69 ± 0.01ab | 4.34 ± 0.09a | 1.52 ± 0.13a |
| 0.15% nucleotides | 8.07 ± 0.12a | 254.36 ± 19.60a | 2.87 ± 0.07a | 0.67 ± 0.02a | 4.81 ± 0.17ab | 1.58 ± 0.21a |
| 0.30% nucleotides | 8.03 ± 0.15a | 286.76 ± 13.01ab | 2.89 ± 0.11a | 0.73 ± 0.02bc | 4.87 ± 0.12b | 1.61 ± 0.21a |
| 0.60% nucleotides | 8.03 ± 0.12a | 332.62 ± 14.00b | 2.94 ± 0.06a | 0.76 ± 0.01c | 4.87 ± 0.08b | 1.73 ± 0.12a |
| 1.20% nucleotides | 8.13 ± 0.09a | 295.36 ± 4.65ab | 2.91 ± 0.07a | 0.74 ± 0.01c | 4.56 ± 0.14ab | 1.62 ± 0.13a |
a, b, c Data are means of triplicate, and presented as mean ± SEM Means in each column with a common superscript are not significantly different (P > 0.05.)
IBW = initial body weight; WG = weight gain; FR = feeding rate; FE = feed efficiency; IL:BL = ratio of intestine length to body length; IW:BW = the ratio of intestine weight to body weight.
Fig. 1Regression analysis of dose-response effect of nucleotides supplementation on weight gain (A) and feed efficiency (B) of hybrid tilapia. Broken-line and polynomial models were fitted for the two cases, respectively. The vertical line indicates doses corresponding to the optimal performance. WG = weight gain; FE = feed efficiency.
The chemical compositions of fish flesh (% as wet) after feeding nucleotide supplemented diets for eight weeks.
| Treatment | Dry matter, % | Protein, % as wet | Lipid, % as wet | Ash, % as wet |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 24.97 ± 0.89a | 15.93 ± 0.58a | 3.87 ± 0.09ab | 2.21 ± 0.06a |
| 0.15% nucleotides | 24.36 ± 0.6a | 15.20 ± 1.46a | 4.18 ± 0.02a | 2.09 ± 0.20a |
| 0.30% nucleotides | 24.43 ± 0.5a | 15.23 ± 0.21a | 3.53 ± 0.16b | 1.96 ± 0.06a |
| 0.60% nucleotides | 25.17 ± 0.68a | 16.51 ± 0.82a | 3.73 ± 0.19ab | 1.90 ± 0.05a |
| 1.20% nucleotides | 25.82 ± 0.66a | 16.24 ± 0.70a | 3.99 ± 0.20ab | 2.03 ± 0.10a |
a, b Data are means of triplicate, and presented as means ± SEM. Means in each column with a common superscript are not significantly different (P > 0.05).
Effect of dietary nucleotides on haematological parameters.
| Treatment | Total protein, g/L | Albumin, g/L | Globulin, g/L | A:G ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 46.05 ± 1.47b | 13.37 ± 0.53b | 32.69 ± 1.35a | 0.41 ± 0.02a |
| 0.15% nucleotides | 42.52 ± 2.4b | 11.28 ± 0.27a | 31.24 ± 2.22a | 0.36 ± 0.02ab |
| 0.30% nucleotides | 43.89 ± 1.08b | 11.15 ± 0.29a | 32.73 ± 0.90a | 0.34 ± 0.01ab |
| 0.60% nucleotides | 45.82 ± 1.87b | 11.05 ± 0.49a | 34.78 ± 1.40a | 0.32 ± 0.01b |
| 1.20% nucleotides | 43.64 ± 1.45b | 12.24 ± 0.56ab | 31.40 ± 1.62a | 0.39 ± 0.03a |
a, b Data are means of triplicate, and presented as means ± SEM. Means in each column with a common superscript are not significantly different (P > 0.05).
A:G = ratio of albumin to globulin.
Effects of dietary nucleotides on anti-oxidant activity in the liver and non-specific immunological parameters in serum.
| Treatment | SOD, U/mgprot | MDA, nmol/mgprot | LYZ, U/mL | C3, g/L | C4, g/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 387.06 ± 9.71a | 2.03 ± 0.11a | 1400.00 ± 43.26a | 0.49 ± 0.03ab | 0.45 ± 0.04a |
| 0.15% nucleotides | 478.59 ± 19.43b | 2.08 ± 0.17a | 1620.05 ± 60.41b | 0.53 ± 0.03ab | 0.45 ± 0.06a |
| 0.30% nucleotides | 434.76 ± 32.18ab | 1.87 ± 0.09b | 1671.43 ± 44.38b | 0.48 ± 0.09ab | 0.48 ± 0.01a |
| 0.60% nucleotides | 488.58 ± 27.91b | 1.72 ± 0.12c | 1557.14 ± 32.72ab | 0.60 ± 0.02a | 0.45 ± 0.05a |
| 1.20% nucleotides | 467.89 ± 12.37b | 1.73 ± 0.13c | 1541.27 ± 72.86ab | 0.44 ± 0.05b | 0.40 ± 0.01a |
a, b, c Data are means of triplicate, and presented as means ± SEM. Means in each column with a common superscript are not significantly different (P > 0.05).
SOD = super oxide dismutase; MDA = malondialdehyde; LYZ = lysozyme; C3 and C4 are complement proteins C3 and C4.
Fig. 2The PCR-DGGE fingerprints of the16S rRNA gene (V3 region) from the adhesive intestinal microbiota of hybrid tilapia after the eight weeks of feeding. Three fish were randomly selected to isolate gut content for gut bacteria detection by PCR-DGGE (n = 3). NT = nucleotides.
Closest relatives and relative abundance of bands from 16S rRNA gene V3 PCR-DGGE fingerprint of adhesive microbiota for the control and 0.6% groups.
| Phylum | Band No. | Closest relative (BLAST search) | Identity, % | Relative abundance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.60% nucleotides | ||||
| Firmicutes | 1 | Lachnospiraceae bacterium (GU723317.1) | 99 | 6.4 ± 1.0 | 6.0.4 ± 0.5 |
| 3 | 100 | 18.1 ± 0.7 | 21.1 ± 2.0 | ||
| 4⁎ | 98 | 9.9 ± 0.3 | 7.9 ± 0.6 | ||
| 8 | 100 | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 1.4 ± 0.7 | ||
| 9 | 98 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | ||
| 10 | 100 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | ||
| 11 | 100 | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 1.0 | ||
| 12⁎⁎⁎ | Lachnospiraceae bacterium (EU728751.1) | 100 | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 0 | |
| 14 | 100 | 24.0 ± 4.0 | 28.1 ± 0.7 | ||
| 10 + 11 | – | – | 7.4 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.9 | |
| 1 + 10+11 + 12⁎⁎⁎ | – | – | 19.1 ± 0.5 | 11.8 ± 0.4 | |
| Proteobacteria | 5 | 100 | 1.4 ± 1.4 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | |
| 6⁎⁎⁎ | 100 | 0 | 3.6 ± 1.0 | ||
| 7⁎ | 99 | 6.3 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 0.5 | ||
| 13 | 100 | 7.4 ± 1.0 | 8.0 ± 0.6 | ||
| Bacteroidetes | 2 | 100 | 7.2 ± 0.2 | 7.7 ± 0.5 | |
⁎ and ⁎⁎⁎ represent significant differences P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively, in relative abundance of the band(s) between the control and 0.60% groups.
Relative abundance data are means of triplicate and presented as means ± SEM, n = 3.
Cumulative relative abundance of putative butyrate-producing species in the adhesive intestinal microbiota.
Fig. 3Cluster analysis of the intestinal microbiota of hybrid tilapia in the control and 0.6% nucleotides inclusion group based on 16S rRNA gene V3 denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprints. C1, C2, C3 = triplicates of control group; 0.6%-1, 0.6%-2, 0.6%-3 = triplicates of 0.6% group.